Az1m0th

https://t00t.azimoth.de/@Az1m0th

Public Key

npub1khzysj4chrpcem0ra6932z7h7grv2g5ndxu6y3wffrskkajryqsquag843

NIP-05 Address

az1m0th_at_t00t.azimoth.de@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqstt3zgf2ut3suvah37azc4p0tlypk9y2fknwdzghy53cttwepjqgqppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5q3gamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7045nr2

Publishing to

nostr.mom

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1khzysj4chrpcem0ra6932z7h7grv2g5ndxu6y3wffrskkajryqsquag843

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-03-25 16:30:53 UTC

- reply

Yes, I think to pass up such an opportunity would've been a grave mistake. As I said: I'm not criticising.
I read the discussion about unified attestation & I do think centralization IS a problem.
But: Unless Fairphone itself made statements attacking GrapheneOS that I don't know of, I don't see how supporting Iodé and Murena rules out a collaboration with gOS. So far FP couldn't build what gOS requires, so they couldn't partner with gOS.
But if Motorola can ask, so can FP👍

2026-03-25 10:43:50 UTC

- reply

how did you end up partnering with Motorola anyways? I don't want to criticise anything here, I'm only still hoping to see GrapheneOS on Fairphone some day. I'm well aware FP so far didn't meet your standards and I can see why you can't lower the bar here. But Motorolas devices so far didn't meet your standards either, and you help them changed that.
Is partnering with FP in a similar way thinkable to guide them towards a FP that has everything needed for proper GrapheneOS support?