HeCheated.org

https://bird.makeup/users/hecheateddotorg

Working to document every instance of men and boys stealing from female athletes in women's sports
This account is a replica from Twitter. Its author can't see your replies. If you find this service useful, please consider supporting us via our Patreon.

Official: https://https://twitter.com/hecheateddotorg
Support this service: https://www.patreon.com/birddotmakeup

Public Key

npub1f6zgxs6uzf5fvvc3umzflmknn8m4jw26lntnejnt6t3s983dp68sggkzh9

NIP-05 Address

hecheateddotorg_at_bird.makeup@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsyapyrgdwpy6ykxvg7d3ylamfena6e89d0e4euef4a9cczncksarcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmntqywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wsa3uzag

Publishing to

relay.momostr.pink

nostr-pub.wellorder.net

yabu.me

Author Public Key

npub1f6zgxs6uzf5fvvc3umzflmknn8m4jw26lntnejnt6t3s983dp68sggkzh9

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-09-02 21:35:10 UTC

🚨Almost an entire year after USA Cycling updated eligibility to female-only, men are still competing in the women's category.
James "Amanda" Tait has been in over 50 USAC races in direct violation of the rules and recently participated in a UCI sanctioned elite event.
https://bird.makeup/users/reduxx/statuses/2095261045094818155
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HRPfofLa4AA4T0a.jpg
#note1ea0…534q

2026-07-31 21:18:40 UTC

http://HeCheated.org is not just an X account. I operate a website that tracks male participation in sport for women and girls.
This was necessary because neither athletic organizations or legislative bodies had made any attempt to do so, and for years, we have been largely left in the dark on the scale of this issue.
That ignorance has allowed unfair policies to be written and outright lies to be spread unchecked.
Yes, the site tracks ALL sports that are sex affected. Even in darts and pool, sex differences show advantages for males. If there is male advantage, even if it's a tiny sliver of one, it's on the site.
Yes, the site tracks ALL levels of sport. All female athletes deserve fairness. The largest number of athletes participate at the amateur and youth level. Their wellbeing and their accomplishments matter too.
Yes, the site tracks ALL competition sizes. Even if it's a small, local race, the women there deserve the same respect and opportunity males have to succeed. These "fun" events are only fun when they are fair. Losing unfairly is not fun.
Yes, the site tracks ALL males. That includes males with DSDs who have been mistakenly "assigned female at birth." All males have an advantage over female athletes, even if they have believed themselves to be female for a number of years.
Yes, the site tracks ALL years. Males have been in women's sports since the 1920s. The more comprehensive the database, the larger picture we get on male advantage and the impact even one male can have. The majority of results, however, are from the past 10 years.
Yes, the site tracks ALL countries. Every woman on earth deserves fairness in sport. Many athletes compete across borders in international competition. Athletes immigrate to other countries. The majority of results, however, have been found in English-speaking countries, especially the United States.
Yes, all results are linked to a source where they can be independently verified.
Yes, all athletes are verified as male. Many can be independently confirmed with a simple Google search. If you have further questions, contact the site, as I do not link more personal family info in public posts.
If you know of any athletes not on the site or see any mistakes that need correcting, please let me know.
Knowledge is power. Arm yourself with it.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOlde35XgAEdoBs.png

2026-07-18 20:31:29 UTC

Team USA put 11 women and 13 men on their mixed roster rather than the even split between 12 and 12. This was likely due to the fact that one man on the Team USA roster pretends that he's a woman.
Based on the scores, even without the extra man, it looks like Team USA would have won anyway, but because they offered an extra place to a male athlete, this means a female athlete was excluded from this incredible opportunity.
Male inclusion means female exclusion.
https://bird.makeup/users/usaultimate/statuses/2078549770105139287

2026-06-19 05:35:00 UTC

And the 2026 Collegiate Defensive Player of the Year, second runner-up:
Zane Bird Smith, a man
Like Helmreich, Bird Smith is a "they/them" man with long hair who participates in the women's division
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HLJ0-CiWgAAxYFA.jpg

2026-05-20 20:19:00 UTC

Reposting this because I added in the other boys as well who don't identify as "trans"
In the United States, the following percentages of high school athletes have achieved the following:
Sub 63 seconds in the 400 meters:
12.5% female athletes
68.4% of "trans"-identified boys
75% of other boys
Sub 60 seconds in the 400 meters:
4.3% of female athletes
36.8% of "trans"-identified boys
59% of other boys
5'2" + (1.58 meters) in the high jump:
7% of female athletes
46% of "trans"-identified boys
64% of other boys
Sub 27 seconds in the 200 meters:
7% of female athletes
46.4% of "trans"-identified boys
70% of other boys
38' + (11.58 meters) in the shot put:
1.6% of female athletes
83% of "trans"-identified boys
25% of other boys
(impossible to do an equal comparison here as the boys' shot put is typically 12lbs/5.44kg while the girls' is 8.8lbs/4kg)
It's bad enough that girls are having their titles, medals, awards, and opportunities stolen by boys, but to make it even worse, girls' accolades are being stolen by boys who are otherwise average, even unathletic and bad at sports.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HIydVN1WsAA-nSB.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HIydbO7XIAABf_H.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HIyde-jXIAAHfc0.jpg

2026-05-18 22:45:46 UTC

"They're just following the rules" they say.
Except even when the rules ban males, they still sneak onto girls' teams.
They're cheating in every sense of the word.
https://bird.makeup/users/reduxx/statuses/2056490630155792581
#note1jse…eqnx

2025-11-04 00:59:57 UTC

🧵One horrifying aspect of the "trans" movement is that it pushes the idea that men pretending to be women always tell the truth, about themselves and everything else. It forces people to not only pretend that men are women, but that these men never lie.
Here's an interesting
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G43y1JGXYAAjbBg.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G43y7I9X0AASLYZ.png

2025-10-26 18:18:57 UTC

- reply

The practice of allowing a single 7th grade boy and his family to strongarm and emotionally manipulate the government into disregarding the rights of every single girl in the state (whose emotional arguments they then disregard or even scoff at) has got to stop.
Thankfully, in this case, the adults in the room made the decision to preserve girls' sport, but it has not gone this way everywhere.
These "7th grade children" they parade around will not be 7th grade children forever. They will grow into adult men who then believe they are entitled to women's spaces because they've never had to hear the word "NO."

2025-10-26 18:18:56 UTC

- reply

"A year later, Fischer would wear the jacket again, this time in front of an audience of state lawmakers in Frankfort, Ky., who sought to ban [boys] such as [him] from playing. It was a statement of sorts, a provocation, a way to “make people mad that someone is wearing a pink jacket to the Capitol,” [he] said."
"“I really don’t want this bill to pass, because that means I can’t play,” Fischer told the legislators. “And that will be extremely detrimental to my mental health, because it’s a way to help me cope with things.”
He wore a pink jacket because he wanted to make people mad?
His jacket isn't the issue. His participation on female teams is.
Wells demonstrated no interest in sport before, he can still play on boys' teams, and if he is having issues with mental health, he should see a therapist. Girls' sports should not be used as mental health programs for boys who are struggling.
His lines come across as coached and rehearsed.

2025-10-26 18:18:55 UTC

- reply

"When Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, a Republican, vetoed his state’s effort to ban transgender students from sports, he pointed out that out of 75,000 high-schoolers who played sports in the state, there are only four known transgender athletes."
“Four kids and only one of them playing girls sports. That’s what this is all about,” Cox wrote. “Four kids who aren’t dominating or winning trophies or taking scholarships. Four kids who are just trying to find some friends and feel like they are part of something.”
There were at least two boys playing girls' sports in Utah (not one) at the time, and one of them recently took a 2nd place medal at the State Championship swim meet as a freshman on a varsity relay team.
(Out of only 2 boys, one pre-pubescent "transitioner" was a "girls'" state championship medalist. Gosh, what are the odds of that?)
Cox's focus only on the few male athletes affected rather than the hundreds of female athletes demonstrates his disregard of female rights entirely.
These four kids can feel like they are a part of something on teams with same-sex teammates. There is nothing stopping them from doing so.

2025-10-26 18:18:54 UTC

- reply

"In neighboring Ohio, state lawmakers were considering a bill that would have called for genital inspections of student-athletes suspected of being transgender."
1. Stop falsifying sex on birth certificates.
2. A cheek swab is not a "genital inspection."
3. Male children already are required to have a "genital inspection" at their yearly sports physical, commonly known as the 'turn and cough' test. Males who pretend to be girls should be no different.
4. Doctors, parents, and school officials should not be lying about the sex of the children in their care.
5. The bill would not require "genital inspections." It would require the above.

2025-10-26 18:18:53 UTC

- reply

"Yet, nationwide, at least 18 states this year passed laws forbidding transgender girls — and sometimes transgender boys — from playing on teams that match their gender identity."
Again, the laws banned males (all males, whether they pretend to be girls or not) from girls' teams in line with the principles of Title IX.
There is no such thing as "gender-identity." Teams are separated by sex.
"The effort to restrict transgender athletes in school sports came as part of a wave of legislation targeting LGBTQ students."
It's an effort to preserve opportunity to participate and succeed in sport for female athletes. The laws don't target "LGBTQ students." They specifically "target" males. ALL MALES are restricted from playing on female teams, and they always have been.
If males with a special "gender identity" are given the "right" to choose whichever team they would like while other males without are not, that is discrimination on the basis of "gender identity."
LGB students also don't seem to have an issue following the same rules as everyone else.

2025-10-26 18:18:52 UTC

- reply

"... a Post analysis of CDC surveys from six states and six urban districts found that 43 percent of transgender students said they played sports — suggesting that about 1 percent of athletes in these jurisdictions are transgender."
Which means that they are fine playing on teams with their same-sex peers, as looking nation-wide, we know that there are not likely 35,395 males (1% of female athletes) in girls' sports.

2025-10-26 18:18:51 UTC

- reply

"Supporters of these measures say they protect sports for cisgender girls and women."
No, they clearly state they are protecting sport for female athletes. I've never seen supports of women's sport use the "c!sgender" pejorative. Most female athletes are not "c!s" as that requires them to have an imaginary "gender identity" that most believe to be ridiculous.
"They say transgender female athletes have a biological advantage. (The science on this is unsettled, and the studies have only examined adults, not children or teens.) Mills said Thomas won because “her reach was several inches longer” than other swimmers’."
They say male athletes have an advantage, which has been proven through over 150 years of athletic records.

2025-10-26 18:18:50 UTC

- reply

“You can see that it is indeed an issue in college athletics and, I believe, coming to be an issue in high school athletics,” Mills said. In an interview with The Washington Post, Mills said he worried some young people would transition just to win competitions: “Sports is about winning, and people will go however far they need to go to win.”
"Transgender athletes and their advocates dismiss the notion as ridiculous given the difficulty of transitioning and the stigma that comes with being transgender. Asked about the lawmaker’s comments, Fischer replied, “That’s poop on the ground, and rotting. It’s not true.”
A 7th grade boy's commentary on an adult legislator's comments: "That's poop on the ground."
It's irrelevant why a man wants to pretend to be a woman. The fact of the matter is that his participation on girls' teams is deeply unfair and discriminatory towards female athletes.

2025-10-26 18:18:49 UTC

- reply

"Instead, on the day the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act became law, he invited Riley Gaines, a highly decorated University of Kentucky swimmer, to talk about Lia Thomas, a transgender competitor from the University of Pennsylvania who stirred controversy when she won an NCAA title in the 500-yard freestyle."
Gaines is a female athlete from Kentucky who was directly negatively impacted by males on female teams.
The author here does not appreciate women giving their side of the story, but only seems to believe we should hear from the single male athlete who wants to be on the girls' team rather than the 400 female athletes his presence will impact.

2025-10-26 18:18:48 UTC

- reply

"The threat to fairness in girls’ sports in Kentucky stands at 5-foot-6, with a chaotic mop of curly hair, long, spindly limbs, freckled cheeks and blue eyes that twinkle when she drops a witticism."
"Before starting field hockey, her highest athletic distinction was a cross-country coach’s award for sportsmanship, earning her a trophy topped by a golden muscled man mid-stride."
This is another common tact that is used, presenting the male as not only a "poor athlete" but as the only one who will ever take advantage of the unfair law.
"There's only one and he's not good at sports," actually demonstrates that they understand these are not really girls because:
1. If they were actually "girls," no different than any other girl, it would not matter if there were one or one hundred.
2. If they were actually "girls", it would not matter if they were the worst athlete in the world or the best in the world.
But these boys are not girls, and their supporters understand this and know that everyone else understands this as well, which is why they need to stress "he isn't that good" and "it's only one" in order to excuse it.
Wells was also in 7th grade at the time. Many of these middle school boys are presented in this way (as small, weak athletes) in the hopes that people forget that this is typical male development.
Middle school girls typically hit puberty before boys. They reach their peak height around 8th grade while boys don't begin really growing until 10th-12th grade. This seems to be true for boys who have blocked their puberty as well.
We've already seen one case in Stratton "Becky" Pepper-Jackson who was paraded around as one of the "worst" athletes on the team in middle school, but by 9th grade he was stealing medals at state championships as a freshman.

2025-10-26 18:18:48 UTC

- reply

"But when state Sen. Robby Mills (R) won a three-year battle to ban transgender girls and women from school sports teams, he did not talk about Fischer Wells or the Westport Warhawks."
That's because Fischer Wells, the individual, is irrelevant. It is about the policy of allowing males onto female teams.
Fischer could be the worst on the team this year and the only athlete in the state, but next year, an entire team of male athletes could show up with the most athletic males in the state and destroy the conference.
Every JV boy in the state could decide he wanted to play on a girls' varsity team instead.
Unlikely, yes, but the policy would allow this to happen.

2025-10-26 18:18:47 UTC

- reply

Laws are not made on the basis of how often an event occurs, nor are they made on the basis of how many times an event is predicted to occur.
If there is a practice occurring that has been deemed harmful, then it does not matter if it has happened one time or one thousand. It does not matter if it might only happen once every five years or once every fifty. Laws are designed to prevent injustice from happening at all.
Male athletes do not magically change across state borders. Kentucky could look at each and every state where males are allowed on girls' teams to see exactly what would happen if males were allowed on girls' teams in their own state.
Saying, "we don't have any examples of [insert crime here] in our state, so we don't need any laws against it" while said crime is known to be widespread elsewhere and even if it weren't would still be harmful if it ever did occur, is very poor practice.

2025-10-26 18:18:45 UTC

- reply

"Then, after the first season concluded, Fischer would suffer another defeat that would sting worse than the first: In March, Kentucky lawmakers passed a law banning athletes like Fischer from playing on girls’ teams."
"Athletes like Fischer" refers to males. Kentucky banned boys from girls' teams.

2025-10-26 18:18:45 UTC

- reply

"Fischer was the state’s only known transgender student-athlete, according to activists and lawmakers. Still, the legislators believed, [he] had to be stopped."
Wells is often paraded as the state's only "transgender athlete."
He was not the only "transgender athlete" in all of Kentucky. He was the only known male athlete playing on a girls' team.
There are likely many female athletes who identify as "trans" who are playing on girls' teams and there may be male athletes identifying as "trans" who are playing on boys' teams. None of these athletes are counted or considered when these conversations are had.
Schools also do not divulge information on males on girls' teams, nor are they required to. Some males don't even divulge to their school that they are male and instead present falsified birth certificates.
As such, any and all claims of "only x number" are baseless and likely false.
Just earlier this year, Pink News reported that only 5 males had been playing on scholastic girls' teams in 2023. We now know for a fact that that number is over 45 and continues to grow as more become uncovered.

2025-10-26 18:18:44 UTC

- reply

"The seventh-grader continued showing up to practices, but [he] couldn’t bring herself to attend the game in which [he'd] be benched. [His] absence seemed to galvanize [his] teammates, who could not believe [he] had been ousted for [pretending to be a girl]. For every goal they scored, they shouted, “For Fischer!”
After a few days, Fischer won back [his] spot on the team when the school district ruled that its own nondiscrimination clause trumped the state athletic regulations."
The district didn't even spend a week considering whether it was unfair for other teams to play against a boy. They spent no time at all thinking about how this negatively impacts female human beings. They didn't speak to any girls on opposing teams in the district.
It's also confusing, was he kicked off the team and missing games, or was he told he would have to sit out games but actually given his spot back within a few days?
"It was the Westport Warhawks’ only victory that season; on the field, they never won a game. For Fischer, that wasn’t the point. Sprinting around the pitch and whacking the ball made [him] feel good. It was fun. [He] had an audience for her jokes."
And again, this clearly illustrates the type of boys joining girls' teams. These boys do not actually care about sport. What they are seeking is "affirmation" and an emotional support group at their beck and call.
If he just wanted to sprint around the pitch, whack at a ball, and have an audience for his jokes, he could invite his friends to hang out and play around at the park.

2025-10-26 18:18:43 UTC

- reply

"For transgender athletes who underwent sex reassignment after puberty, the association required that “surgical anatomical changes have been completed, including external genitalia changes and gonadectomy,” procedures that are not recommended for young people."
What is being said here is that if a boy wanted to join a girls' team he could as long as he had been castrated.
This is both offensive to female athletes (in implying that we are no different than castrated males), unethical in requiring castration in order to participate on a team, and still unfair as we know castrated males still outperform female athletes.

2025-10-26 18:18:42 UTC

- reply

"Because Fischer — besides being a middle-schooler with boundless enthusiasm, a bookworm and a novice field hockey player — is transgender."
It's because he is male. If he were "transgender" and female, there would have been no issue.
"The association had set extraordinarily high hurdles for transgender athletes to play on teams that matched their gender identity. It required that transgender athletes undergo “sex reassignment” before puberty — though it was unclear what that meant."
There are no teams based on "gender identity" so it would be very difficult, indeed, to join one that "matches."
Wells is male, therefore, the team he "matches" would be one for males.
"Sex reassignment" is impossible, so I agree that that's unclear. It's likely they meant a boy had to have blocked his puberty, which has been demonstrated again and again does not remove male advantage.

2025-10-26 18:18:41 UTC

- reply

"A month into the season, [his] parents were fighting for [his] right to play. The first games had been marred with challenges. First, there were not enough players, until Fischer recruited classmates to fill out the team.
Then Fischer’s stick was too short. Finally, through a teary phone conversation with the athletic director, [his] parents had learned the Kentucky High School Athletic Association’s rules would not allow Fischer to play."
Activists often parade Wells around as a boy who "started the team," but this is false.
What Wells did was convince some girls to join the team so they would have enough players.
He was aware from the beginning that this was a girls' team. His parents should have been reinforcing to him the reality that he is not a girl and helped him start a boys' team or organize friendly games at the park.
Instead, they encouraged him in a lie which obviously would only end in disappointment.

2025-10-26 18:18:40 UTC

🧵This is an older story, but one that seems to be circulating again in TRA circles, so let's break it down.
(link at the end)
"When 13-year-old Fischer Wells signed up for field hockey last fall, she had never played the sport. [His] parents were confounded."
"Fischer had run cross-country before and once tried out unsuccessfully for a street hockey team, but outside of that, the seventh-grader had not expressed much interest in sports."
Right off the bat, we're presented with the typical boy who joins a girls' team. Unathletic, never much showed interest in sports before he pretended to be a girl, was not able to compete well against male peers.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G4M4JLWXsAAutyo.png

2025-10-26 06:17:40 UTC

The "They just want to have fun with their friends" argument throws up immediate red flags for multiple reasons:
1. Why do none of these boys seem to have a single male friend? It's very uncommon for girls not to have any male friends in school, let alone for boys not to.
2. We often make new friends through sports. That's where many people make their closest friends because of the amount of time spent together and shared interest. Why are these boys somehow incapable of making new friends? Why are these boys refusing to befriend other male classmates?
3. Do these boys have no other way to hang out with their friends? They can't set up a pickup game at the park? Go to a movie together? Hang at the mall? Why is the only time they have to "hang out with friends" at a school-sanctioned event where their "friends" are obligated to show up and have no choice over their teammates?
4. Do these boys have no friends outside the team? Why do all of their friends always seem to play a sport they just joined yesterday?
5. Why are these boys treating varsity sport as some sort of frivolous hangout? Do they think girls' sports are a joke? That girls aren't working their butts off to make these teams?
Why are they downplaying the sweat and tears, the thousands of hours of dedication and practice these athletes put in in pursuit of their dreams? What do they think gives them the right to trivialize the athletic dreams and accomplishments of female students while those of male athletes are given the utmost importance?

2025-07-10 02:27:55 UTC

❓Where are they now❓
Michael "Lauren" Jeska burst onto the "women's" fell (mountain) running scene in the late 2000s, winning no fewer than 40 races between 2008 and 2015 including 4 national championship titles in English and British fell running.
Jeska also ran at parkrun,
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gvdh_O0XIAA39SA.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GvdiAZfbMAAm4Bh.jpg

2025-05-31 22:29:26 UTC

I don't understand. I just don't understand what is wrong with people.
How on earth have people convinced themselves that even though there are two very distinct, observable categories of anatomy and development in humans, that if individuals in group B wishes they had the anatomy of group A, that somehow means we should pretend they do and completely ignore the fact that they don't.
To the detriment of individuals in group A.
This is just a boy, a very untalented, mediocre boy beating girls in what was supposed to be a girls' race, and a segment of the population believes this is a good thing.
https://bird.makeup/@riley_gaines_/1928912193572966724

2025-04-06 06:05:20 UTC

Men have stolen over $151,000 from female disc golfers.
https://bird.makeup/@mattxiv/1908256969842188573