Joseph Quattrocchi

https://mastodon.cloud/@quattrocchi

Participating in social consumption, production, collection, sorting, ranking, then filtering of information.

Homepage: https://quattrocchi.network/

Public Key

npub106e8gzcsrr4r4fvsseskyr4rhx96mc5a557a3x7cvdnvk8j4yqfsvy6jxq

NIP-05 Address

quattrocchi_at_mastodon.cloud@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs8avn5pvgp36365kggvctzp63mnzadu2w620wcn0vxxektre2jqycpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds0jryve

Publishing to

nostr-pub.wellorder.net

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub106e8gzcsrr4r4fvsseskyr4rhx96mc5a557a3x7cvdnvk8j4yqfsvy6jxq

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-07-07 20:16:20 UTC

- reply

Instance closures seem to be very common. Should Mastodon GmbH consider offering a service to take over or host instances that are losing their maintainers?
Of course, full data portability would make closures less disruptive. But the persistence of posts themselves is also important: old posts help people navigate, search, and filter the enormous volume of information on the internet. When an instance disappears, that public record can disappear with it.

2026-02-08 23:40:16 UTC

- reply

They point to a few examples, which overstates the scope of the issue. Here's the link: https://social.chinwag.org/@FediThing/116030359239630783

2026-02-08 09:42:28 UTC

@npub1sf9…5mv4 There is a renewed viral campaign calling for users to leave or mass-block this instance. Since I’ve been using the service, there have been several such campaigns, focused on moderation levels and software updates.
Given the broader impact on the user base, it would be helpful to know whether and how you plan to address these concerns, or if there is an official statement users can reference.