fountainhead

"85457a735edd9861f3d329a5de32e4869a3b8ed18456681aed70d96e8821fd90708a4a1999232e98ebde360bf583e17119fc94a32e13f2fb8bb251dce4d867d4"

Last Notes

2026-07-13 15:28:08 UTC

@nprofile…ayk6 @nprofile…5z4g @nprofile…jwxr
Apologize if this has already been discussed, but, during the BIP110 mandatory signaling period, will Ocean’s back end flip to enforcing? In other words, will the pool still accept non-signaling shares during this period?
Similarly, should there be a resultant chain split, will the pool only mine on the new BIP-110 chain tip?

2026-05-22 01:13:32 UTC

- reply

pumpkin pie…

2026-05-21 01:23:53 UTC

- reply

Certainly not arguing the side of on chain zaps, but isn’t the picture you painted more of an ‘address reuse’ issue than a ‘on chain zap’ specific issue?

2026-04-09 12:54:43 UTC

- reply

@nprofile…sfud @npub100m…fyy5
I really like the idea of this and am currently spinning up a new/separate pruned knots node to test it out.
There’s been a lot of talk or inferring about the advantages of this with regard to getting clean non KYC’d sats. I totally get that from a ‘mining’ perspective in general, but, unless you rent the hash from Braiins using non KYC’d sats to begin with, aren’t you essentially KYC’ing all sats associated with your payout address?
@nprofile…swak ‘s video yesterday made it clear that you shouldn’t fund your Braiins account directly from an exchange, but, instead, you should fund it from a separate wallet once removed from the exchange (e.g. exchange -> sparrow-> Braiins). I fail to see how this accomplishes anything.
What am I missing here?

2025-08-06 17:31:26 UTC

@nprofile…hk3q with the AnchorWatch legends…FIRE!
https://fountain.fm/episode/nucsXUKBM3YjxLrMgzT1
https://blossom.primal.net/087838f43f184d33a5fda421e3fd54ef47c0f89be9a027a19aea9f14d0d77de5.png

2024-10-29 01:14:50 UTC

- reply

#solomining