maegul (he/they)

A little bit of neuroscience and a little bit of computing

Last Notes

2024-08-26 03:35:24 UTC

Rant …
::: spoiler spoiler
I’m talking about Ash/Rook, obviously.
Just saw the film recently, and while it’s a bit of a love it or hate it film I think, the Rook character is I think objectively egregious.
The idea is good, IMO, in a number of ways, and I can understand that the film makers felt like it was all done with love and affection for Holm and the character. As a viewer, not necessarily onboard with how many cues the film was taking from the franchise, I noticed the silhouette of Rook pretty quickly and was quite happy/hyped to see where it would go.
**But OMG the execution is unforgivable!** And I feel like this is just so much of what’s wrong with Hollywood and VFX, and also indicates that some execs were definitely intervening in this film. Somewhat fortunately for the film, it had a low budget (AFAICT, by Wikipedia) and is making a profit.
But it’s no excuse to slap some bad CGI onto shots that were not designed for bad CGI. Close ups on the uncanny valley! Come on! AFAICT, bad CGI is often the result of a complete disconnect between the director and the VFX crew, in part because the VFX industry is kept at arms length from the film industry, despite (it because of) its massive importance.
That CGI is not something you do a close up on. No remotely decent director would have done that knowing the CGI looked like that. This is likely bad studio management creating an unworkable situation.
What could have worked much better IMO is don’t have the synth functioning well. Have its facial expressions and movements completely artificial and mechanical. Rely on the likeness of Holm and the AI voice (which did and generally do work well). Could have been done just with a well directed animatronic coupled with some basic CGI to enrich some textures and details. Instead we got a dumb “we’ll do it in post” and tortured some poor editor into cutting those shots together.
For many the film was a mixed bag. For me too. But this somehow prevents me from embracing it because I just don’t trust the people who made it.
:::
… End rant.

2024-08-09 01:23:35 UTC

- reply

Very much appreciate that you did this (and this follow up too)!!
But lunduke is a fairly known entity by now I think. I recall many getting weird about him and his business-y linux persona shtick even before the transphobia stuff started. So while it's completely fair to give Melroy a chance, providing a helping hand on mastodon almost just speaks for itself.
And I'm not even saying that mbin necessarily *should* "die" because of this, just that it likely reflects an attitude that will not work well on the fedi over time, and probably justifiably so.

2024-08-09 01:07:06 UTC

- reply

Well that is certainly relevant news! And sad to see too.
So long for the kbin family of platforms then (seriously, harsh to say, but so long as this is representative, I reckon that spells the end of it on the fediverse).

2024-08-04 10:35:47 UTC

- reply

If you’re wondering about lemmy compatibility: https://mastodon.social/@pixelfed/112902986123309202
Lemmy and piefed compatibility will be there it seems.
If you’ve got other questions, dansup, lead dev, is pretty outgoing and probably happy to talk.

2024-07-26 13:23:59 UTC

- reply

> But we just have these blunt tools and lots of fine granular tools that would be able to actually tackle the issues are missing on Lemmy.
Tools could always be better for sure! This is still beta software after all! And the fediverse ecosystem is still finding its feet.
That being said … isn’t subscribing to communities a pretty good tool already? I ask because it strikes me that many here might be talking about the “all” feed. If so, that’d be a case of people just not using the tools given to them (and also an abuse of this system frankly).
> And I think we should revamp some other aspects too to foster good behaviour. I don’t see things change substancially, the way it is.
Think I’m totally with you there. The fediverse for me has been a bit of a let down in terms of how much it has just recreated big social platforms without more experimentation. It’s early days and all so I don’t want to be harsh on all the devs. They’ve done great things. But it does feel like some basic revamping could be quite nice.

2024-07-26 10:23:10 UTC

- reply

> Defederation might be part of that
As you say, it's a very blunt tool and likely only able to create more civil interactions by creating a fairly strong echo chamber.
My perspective on "defederation" conversations, hinted at in my comment above, is that it's a new "tool", a new phenomenon etc. Nothing like it existed on reddit for example. And so it's natural that there will be "unwise", premature and overzealous calls to use it as though it's the solution to many of our social media problems, when in reality it's a relatively subtle tool best used in concert with active and relatively sophisticated community building and organising.
Which all makes sense to me. But what's a little sad I think is that we have here a pretty good compromise between "absolute free speech is bad" and "censorship is bad" for social media, and instead of embracing it as an ideology we've gotten some loud voices eager to use it as a territorial weapon for drawing boundaries around spaces *for everyone else* without, AFAICT, much the same in the way of actually building spaces that suit people's needs (though that happens too of course).
If one wants or needs a space that is shut off completely from what one would call "extreme" politics, that's totally fine. Doesn't mean *all of lemmy world and half or more of the communities on lemmy should be cut off* in a big "us and them" statement. Instead ... you probably need an instance that caters to that world view. You may need to try to start organising it yourself if it doesn't exist. Except, that's harder than posting a "lets defederate" post.

2024-07-26 08:53:48 UTC

- reply

I’ll add to hendrik’s sibling post … it seems you’re relatively new to the fediverse. You may want to get a feel for the place before advocating for such wide reaching actions.
I’m all for expressing your feelings on an issue, but I do wonder if your eagerness is a bit premature. I myself “called for” defederation early in my time on the fediverse … and it was dumb of me.
Since then I’ve come to view most arguments around the idea of defederation suspiciously. There’s usually a bit of personal drama or a shallow opinion or people who want to loudly voice opinions without wanting to put work into making this place better. Usually, if defederation is actually needed, the admins will know before you do and it will be obvious.
All that being said … I’d ask you … what do you think federation and decentralisation is for?