PowderHound

Public Key

npub1avgjma5el6heglcf200379xd690c6m3ry2kfay7wk4zvsk8v5y6sjta7yg

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqswkyfd76vlatu50uy48hclznxazhuddc3j9ty7j08t23xgtrk2zdgpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3exzuewv9c8qqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t00xp62c

Publishing to

Author Public Key

npub1avgjma5el6heglcf200379xd690c6m3ry2kfay7wk4zvsk8v5y6sjta7yg

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-10-05 20:46:48 UTC

- reply

I don't know anyone who considers that a serious issue. I try to tune them out because I think they're just yelling about it in the hopes of getting the govt to protect their declining subscription-based business model against the low cost and increasingly comparable open source models.

2026-10-05 17:31:52 UTC

- reply

Needle

2026-10-05 13:15:40 UTC

- reply

I find testing to be the biggest weak spot of current models. They lack common sense to they are apt to take shortcuts and add theater as they goal seek a green test. I have thousands of tests in projects and I hope that a decent percentage are properly written. I'm not sure what the solution is except to do red green tdd and just constantly improve tests over time.

2026-09-30 14:05:56 UTC

- reply

yes, time to stock up. I have two oil changes stocked but now I'm wondering if that's enough...

2026-09-29 21:13:58 UTC

- reply

yes, I work with AI agents too much to trust them. No common sense. I personally think LLMs are a dead end for real artificial intelligence, which will be self-learning, have common sense (understand real world cause and effect), and probably more closely resemble bio intelligence. Scared also of giving any big tech company such control over my life. Would wait for a local agent that I could fully control.

2026-09-29 20:27:10 UTC

- reply

Any key use cases that you're loving them for?

2026-09-29 19:04:38 UTC

- reply

I've come to realize that I like the fact that it's a small group of mostly builders and bitcoiners. Maybe I have digital agoraphobia...

2026-09-29 19:00:25 UTC

- reply

I work with AI too much to trust personal agents in their current form. I find they generally don't have common sense. I also don't want facebook or google embedded into my computers. I'm imagining things will be a lot better in a few years with better local models.

2026-09-29 18:54:33 UTC

- reply

I love that we can use bitcoin to reduce energy costs for humanity and stablize the grid butI must admit tuning out whenever the bitcoin as "clean energy so we can stop man-made climate change" comes up.

2026-09-29 18:41:35 UTC

- reply

Hard part is always testing. Agents will tell you it's properly tested when it's all theater. You'll have thousands of tests and just hope that some solid percentage of them are real. Hopefully the new testing integration in the game harness will solve that.

2026-09-29 17:04:13 UTC

- reply

River

2026-09-29 14:40:01 UTC

- reply

My diet is meat heavy now. Experience generally good. Find that it's easy to maintain a consistent weight. I went keto for a while a long time ago. Very positive, after the ~1 week "flu". It helped me notice my hunger pangs were just sugar cravings. Had more consistent energy. I think keto is good for resets. Not sure anyone would need to maintain for long term unless you have other issues (aware that some mental health issues see improvements from keto).

2026-09-29 14:12:44 UTC

- reply

Yes, this sums it up. There are people who see the project as a hope to make the world a better place (fix the money, fix the world), and those who don't. My perspective comes from having kids and family that I hope have some of the freedoms that I grew up with. Protecting them from being fiat debt slaves. That you don't care is actually sad really. It's says that you're not thinking about or hoping for a positive future. Nothing to care about.

2026-09-29 14:01:42 UTC

- reply

Yes, exactly why the community just ends up in binaries (this good, this bad). it's a tradeoff between saying something, or saying quiet when people are about to "invest" in that new trump memecoin (or whatever). Personally it's better to say something even if it has to be a tldr for new people. We've all made mistakes and learned from them. IMHO better to protect people than not.

2026-09-29 13:34:07 UTC

- reply

This is true. There were some toxic bitcoiners screaming that hardware wallets were shitcoins because their risks were not being properly disclosed. Hard for most people to understand the risks and the community is constantly trying to create simplified heuristics to help with the education process. The concept of shitcoin is such an attempt. Most people don't have the time or ability to dig into the nuanced details. The binary (bitcoin vs shitcoin) is a simplified heuristic that is correct the vast majority of the time. Sadly the community failed with hardware wallets. I suspect because they were a source of revenue for podcasters and had better UX than dice rolling, etc.

2026-09-29 13:10:00 UTC

- reply

I agree with you. Your definition is similar to mine: "A token that is a likely rug-pull because its defects are not well known to users." I think your definition might be better. The reason I classify Monero as a shitcoin (despite appreciating its attempt at privacy), is because users don't know the risks of inflation bugs (like how Liquid got attacked), the difference in supply emission, and how people overestimate the privacy aspect because of its small usage. Giacomo Zucco I think spent some time addressing this; also Seth's post is related: https://sethforprivacy.com/posts/why-i-focus-on-bitcoin/

2026-09-29 12:53:25 UTC

- reply

A token that is a likely rug-pull because its defects are not well known to users.

2026-09-29 11:48:43 UTC

- reply

They are not fake purity tests. They are attempts to protect new entrants from common mistakes. After watching people get burned through false shitcoin promises, bitcoiners have a tendency to not want to promote shitcoining.

2026-09-29 11:36:57 UTC

- reply

Or, are you just getting started?

2026-09-27 12:21:03 UTC

- reply

I'm not as knowledgeable as some in the community, so I can only provide a partial list. Op_cat is powerful and nobody knows all the ways it can be used. It's a hope that creative attackers won't later find a way to abuse it. Like with the changes with segwit and taproot that were later abused to make it easier and cheaper to add inscriptions to the chain, if something has unknown scope, it could be used in ways we don't foresee. Also, developers are focused on the technical risks of the proposal. Few are considering the full system of overlapping incentives that make the bitcoin network function properly and keep it decentralized. Op_cat likely increases the power of miners over the nodes by increasing MEV extraction attacks, promoting miner centralization. Those who oppose op_cat often take the view that bitcoin is our best hope for separating money from state and we must move carefully. Just as we wouldn't make changes to a operating nuclear power plant without understanding the full risks, we shouldn't just make changes to the bitcoin network without understanding the full risks. As nobody can know the full risks of a feature like op_cat (because of its flexibility and power), it should be used only in sidechains and L2s.
https://milkroad.com/guide/mev/

2026-09-22 18:39:24 UTC

- reply

With all the recent bitcoin attacks, bitcoin security is on many people's minds. The reason many bitcoiners take issue with op_cat isn't because it's "inefficient" or "too general of a solution". It's because it increases security risks. You have an opportunity to explain those top concerns simply to help educate people on both sides of the debate.

2026-09-16 12:23:42 UTC

- reply

Tree circle of life

2026-09-13 19:27:19 UTC

- reply

High protein ... cricket powder? Not gonna eat the bugs.

2026-09-13 15:36:48 UTC

- reply

AI is not actually intelligent. It's only a tool without its own goals and is fully dependent on humans. It can only live in a sandbox created by humans. There is already a kill switch. It's the power breaker. You can just flip it when you want to turn it off.

2026-09-13 14:28:45 UTC

- reply

2017 vibes. Making me feel younger. Maybe we'll cycle through this every decade.

2026-09-13 14:21:56 UTC

- reply

I can't believe that this is still a debate in 2026. Retro 2017 vibes.

2026-09-13 14:17:49 UTC

- reply

Unfortunately, you can't just throw bodies at a project and make it better. Not sure if you've managed a large dev team. As you add people your team overhead in communication and coordination increases causing lower productivity. Amazon famously had their restriction that no team could be larger than the people that could eat two boxes of pizza. You also can't dismiss the tradeoffs between layers and decentralization. The smaller the base layer data requirements, the more nodes that can independently operate. It's a no-brainer for me. The best system is the one with the greatest ability to run local nodes at global scale while preserving created trust.

2026-09-13 13:51:52 UTC

- reply

I'm sure the Liquid team thought they were being "aggressive" in their security too. We have no idea how much effort developers are putting into their projects. My point is that the uncertainty is the problem. You can't know, nobody can. The only thing you can trust is what you can audit. I can prove for myself there are only 21 million BTC.

2026-09-13 13:48:39 UTC

- reply

That's not racism. It's the opposite. He's clearly expressing his concern for how govt intervention is harming black people. Lowering standards for a group will obviously have negative consequences. The govt is literally branding an entire race as not equally competent. It's pretty clear that govt intervention has harmed black people. As another example, you can either believe that black fathers just naturally abandon their children at far higher rates than everyone else, or you can believe that there is another systemic underlying cause at work. I would think that people who knowingly support a system that harms a group of people based on their race, are actually the racists.

2026-09-13 13:03:22 UTC

- reply

It's one of the reasons I've been collecting passports and residencies. Long time believer in the Sovereign Individual thesis. The welfare nation states will need to go through the "great adjustment" where they slowly go bankrupt. They can't avoid it and will be dangerous places as it happens. Already, in places like Canada, the majority of voters in the country are financially dependent on the government. Direct welfare, employment, subsidies, etc. Once you're dependent on the govt, you'll likely continue to vote for more socialism until your physical safety is directly at risk. It took Argentina 80 years to reach that point. As the world transitions multi-polar, I'm hoping there will be safe havens in the world (but not guaranteed, of course). Another part of the SI thesis is the decentralizing effects of technology. YOu can see that playing out in open source AI models. Always getting cheaper and easier to run locally. World in transition, but many reasons to be optimistic.

2026-09-13 12:52:31 UTC

- reply

By a boomer? I think the norm for Gen X and below is now to text first instead of just randomly calling someone. For a while, I couldn't handle the spam. I just sent all calls to VM and disabled VM so I never had to check it.

2026-09-13 12:43:56 UTC

- reply

Sure, it might be finite, but you don't know how many more bugs are in there. It's the uncertainty that kills it. You can never know if you fixed all the bugs. When you have a choice between storing your life savings in one vs the other, you'll always choose the more certain one.

2026-09-13 12:32:00 UTC

- reply

We've all just watched Liquid get burned because of confidential transactions. Nobody can tell if there is an inflation bug until it's too late. It's necessary for a globally trusted base money to be open and visible to be trustworthy. We need to add privacy in other ways (joins, L2, etc.)

2026-09-13 12:18:58 UTC

- reply

Silicon Valley

2026-09-13 12:14:12 UTC

- reply

It seems many bitcoiners do, which surprises me. I would have expected more suspicion for fiat world narratives. 9/11 was actually my blackpill moment. I was glued to the news that morning. I remember clearly the news updates on flight 93. They were interviewing folks from the ground reporting how they had heard planes flying overhead, and a large explosion in the sky. They also showed scenes of parts wreckage strewn over large areas of ground. Bits of engine here, plane parts over there. Then at some point they pivoted to show a burnt area of ground, again no crash wreckage. A while later they started reporting that a plane had crashed into the ground, and at first I had thought they were referring to another plane. After they stopped reporting about the explosion in the sky, and no longer showed the burnt ground, I realized that they were actually talking about the same plane and had switched stories. I justified it at the time by thinking that Cheney had claimed he had the power to order planes to be shot down, and they did, but changed the story when they discovered the phone calls about the passengers going to attempt to storm the cockpit. Why explain about shooting down the plane when you can make heroes of the passengers? Then I started realizing that pretty much everything they told us was not true. Opened my eyes.

2026-07-30 12:59:41 UTC

- reply

Don't believe it; looks like AI. I think the real room would have had plastic covering on the couch.

2026-07-29 14:14:26 UTC

- reply

I'm blackpilled at this point. Not expecting accountability.