Juha Autero

Profile for my #anticapitalist #coöperative #solarpunk #indieweb future.

homepage: https://www.eipystyilman.beer/

Last Notes

2026-09-07 07:59:39 UTC

- reply

Now I have to travel to Scotland to take another selfie with Kelpies.

2026-07-17 07:26:52 UTC

- reply

Apparently you haven't heard of "Heil Honey I'm Home!" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heil_Honey_I%27m_Home!

2026-03-23 14:20:51 UTC

- reply

To make accessibility interesting, you either need knowledge about challenges disabled people have by being disabled or having close relationship with people who are. Or have enough expertise on accessibility to find it interesting. Most FOSS developers have neither.
2/3

2026-03-23 14:20:05 UTC

- reply

Because first is seen as interesting, but the second one isn't. Building age verification in OS is an interesting intellectual puzzle that will turn into sunk cost fallacy (I have thought about this so much, I simply have to think about it.
1/3

2026-01-27 14:26:16 UTC

- reply

For some reason AWS Data Transfer Terminals only provide upload.

2025-10-11 06:55:23 UTC

- reply

I'm not saying that modern software is good. I'm saying software has always been bad. The only reason original Mac Calculator didn't leak 32 GB of RAM is that it didn't have 32 GB memory to leak. (Technically Motorola 68000 couldn't even handle that amount of memory.)
Tip: If your software has a watchdog that restarts it because it keeps crashing, you can fix memory leaks by adding module that exits the program if memory consumption gets too big. Two fixes for a price of one!

2025-10-11 04:12:07 UTC

- reply

Collapse implies that there has been huge drop in software quality. I have not perceived such a thing. We just have gotten better in assessing software quality.
Then again, I've only used computers since 1980s. Maybe the drop in quality happened before that.

2025-10-03 03:49:19 UTC

- reply

Who is this "we"? Co-operative is not the legal entity, it is the group of people working for common purpose. It only makes sense to start working for incorporation when you have the group of people who have agreement of the purpose. That is the structural foundation that needs to be solid. Of course it is simpler if one person decides the purpose, but that's not democracy. Result is you see people spoiling your great idea and start to think Hitler might have been right.

2025-10-03 02:58:19 UTC

- reply

When do you plan to involve other people? This obviously is not building together you talk about.

2025-10-02 21:52:03 UTC

- reply

The second one started with a blog post about starting a co-op for taking internet back from Big Tech. There were people exitedly agreeing to that. Original poster got back few months later and told they haven't had time to do anything about it and the thing fizzled out. I worry the same will happen to this peertube co-op.

2025-10-02 21:44:54 UTC

- reply

I've had two bad experiences about these kind of projects. First one was about setting up source forge. There was four of us on xmpp chat. One of them thought that decision making is the most important thing and started to design elaborate process for that. Another mentioned some server that we could use and went to sort out that. I decided that wasnät going anywhere and left the chat.

2025-10-02 21:23:54 UTC

- reply

You don't know what the right tool is beforehand. All you can do is keep swiching cost as low as possible and change as needed. No plan ever survives contact with the enemy. That is why you need to respond to change over following a plan.

2025-10-02 21:09:58 UTC

- reply

What would a co-op running peertube use office suite for?

2025-07-06 07:55:35 UTC

- reply

Stock price is an accumulation of price changes. Markets don't value things to specific price. They value things higher or lower than previously. This explains absurd valuations of companies (like Tesla at $1 trillion) and billionaires (like Elon Musk).
See "random walk hypothesis". https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_walk_hypothesis

2025-07-01 12:44:07 UTC

- reply

Which you get either by agreement or by coercion.

2025-07-01 08:29:47 UTC

- reply

Yes, and it's individuals collectively that make systemic changes.

2025-04-17 13:50:00 UTC

- reply

Tilannetta kuvaa hyvin Suomen kirjastoseuran lausunto hankintalain muutosehdotuksesta, josta keskusteltiin täällä: https://mementomori.social/@hannamorre/114238884101797372 Aika hankalaa on hankintojen kilpailuttaminen, jos ainut asia jonka voi kilpailuttaa on kirjastojärjestelmä ja niitäkin on tarjolla markkinoilla vain yksi.