racyturtle

here for youth liberation & justice for MAPs/YAPs/pedophiles

my core beliefs summarized as:
🧠: anti-censorship, anti-moralism, anti-western mainstream
❤️: anarchism, communism, agonistic egalitarianism
🧘: progressivism, spirituality, mindful life-affirmation

Public Key

npub1w0ffjhhp8kdznj9zlf4tm2wgr8hujhskynln72jnkkfr5u3ec2jq4f4m65

NIP-05 Address

racyturtle_at_mapsupport.de@momostr.pink

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs8855etmsnmx3fez30564a48ypnm7ftctzflel9ffmty36wguu9fqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds6nlyq6

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1w0ffjhhp8kdznj9zlf4tm2wgr8hujhskynln72jnkkfr5u3ec2jq4f4m65

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-10-21 13:43:28 UTC

my biggest mistake in recent years was believing that 99% of people aren't actually completely stupid and alienated from life, just as I have always thought before, but only like 90% who can also be "saved" if you put in the required effort.
boy, was I wrong... the depravity of people is beyond any hope of salvation. it seems to be the fate of most humans to be herd-driven conformist idiots.
the "educated adult" I considered myself to be was blinded by adopted views that were never mine, while the careless 14yo me was actually right the whole time. ironic.

2026-09-20 11:46:51 UTC

- reply

I don't brag about it and I don't do it "intentionally" either. I simply allow contradictions when they arise, because that is the most sensible way to gain any insight at all (dialectic or perspectivism). Constantly basing one's statements or one's thinking on a perfect model of the world with clearly defined inviolable concepts and terms is the exact opposite of gaining insight.

2026-09-19 21:00:36 UTC

- reply

I constantly make contradictory statements. One moment I *obviously* meant something different about politics than the next. And that's totally okay. Your urge to rationalize is also a dogma btw.

2026-09-19 20:49:52 UTC

- reply

you're obviously acting in bad faith or you're simply insisting that you do everything correctly, but your constant rationalizing probably prevents you from even noticing it yourself. Just stop twisting everything I say.

2026-09-19 20:34:48 UTC

- reply

I meant what I said. children don't care about politics. my implication is that it's a good thing. I ask others why they care? because it makes no difference whether someone cares about it or not. that's my message. all I wanted to say. and all it takes to understand that is the ability to read between the lines.
furthermore, if there is genuine uncertainty about my statement, a friendly curiosity would be more appropriate than a lecture stating that I wouldn't know the widespread information that everything is political.

2026-09-19 20:14:23 UTC

- reply

you somehow have a problem with interpreting stuff how it's meant (at least with me). it's obvious what was meant, it's you who twist it into me having expressed it incorrectly. I stand by my statement.

2026-09-19 20:10:03 UTC

- reply

caring about politics is high cortisol stressmaxxing, no more no less. seriously engaging with it changes absolutely nothing. zero. it only affects your own well-being, which should be the only thing that matters to you. yes everything is political, but that doesn't mean you actually have to think about all day.

2026-09-19 20:03:51 UTC

children don't care about politics. why do you?

2026-09-06 06:50:36 UTC

- reply

intuition creates, while critical thinking evaluates. At least that's my view on it.
Also intuition is not instinct. It is an inherent cognitive ability to make an assessment or to have an insight based on patterns and information. now you could say that research is also required here to make use of this, but I disagree. There are certain universal patterns which repeat themselves over and over again throughout life, in the most varied and diverse places. Ultimately, life isn't that deep (especially once you have understood that aspect).
research is still good though and I recommend researching stuff.

2026-09-05 19:56:56 UTC

- reply

strongly disagree with 3, I can believe whatever the heck I want without researching it, because that's why critical thinking and intuition exists. I have no desire and also no time bothering with useless information about everything, especially if you often have to wade through countless propaganda to do so. besides, data is not everything and empiricism is overrated. being ready to challenge one's own convictions at any time is the only thing that matters.

2026-08-10 16:14:58 UTC

If your brain stops developing after age 25, you're a loser.

2026-07-16 09:48:28 UTC

I really can't stand normies in the EU "critically" talking about chat control as if they were not the most boring person in the world who no one gives a shit about reading their messages.
Their virtue signaling for "violation of privacy" is completely useless when in the same breath they're spouting things like "child protection is definitely important, but not like that!!" and which is basically their only argument for this matter.
Everyone acts so brave and strong, but when it comes to questioning the true scapegoats and the actual oppressed groups, no one makes a single noise, because neither pedophiles nor children will give them enough virtue signaling points to convince the herd of their unique and admirable magnificence. Pathetic.

2026-07-02 21:57:07 UTC

RE: https://mapsupport.de/@lovoy/116851712227673342
This should be a wake-up call for anti-Cs or "non-offending" MAPs. German MAPs have waited 4 years just to make dolls legal again and they still failed. I am just as annoyed, but not surprised either.
We can't win by appealing to the the same structures that want to destroy us. We can only win if we overcome these structures.
It's never too late to radicalize. We are all on the same side. Put an end to nonsensical divisions like "contact stances" and recognize what's truly necessary for change in the world.
#note1cne…ra2a

2026-07-01 19:30:07 UTC

Hot take, but I think therapy is useless or even harmful for most people, partly because most therapists have absolutely no competence in their field which should be common knowledge among MAPs, given that the vast majority of therapists would refuse to work with MAPs at all.

2026-06-30 02:01:27 UTC

https://mapsupport.de/system/media_attachments/files/116/836/584/550/998/410/original/8b176d369205118e.jpg

2026-06-28 19:16:52 UTC

The concept of an adult is to be alienated from oneself, one's own environment, and other people, in order to become a functioning cog in the system.
That's why I say that children are the real humans.

2026-06-27 19:20:02 UTC

they talk about "children's rights", but what they mean:
- less rights for more "security"
- more extensive parental control rights
- positive discrimination
- stricter integration into the system
- age segregation

2026-06-14 09:42:22 UTC

RE: https://mapsupport.de/@racyturtle/116741615221587477
y'all hesitate to vote for no reason. just pick the boring option if you don't care enough (unless you don't know me at all)
#note1lwk…qzkr

2026-06-13 07:28:01 UTC

Without considering the content I post, if you had to pick a characteristic that you don't like about me, which one of these would you choose? I think all 4 apply to me in some way.

2026-06-13 03:38:24 UTC

- reply

people will say it's so important for everyone to talk about it, because the completely unknown concept of rich men having sex with young girls apparently explains how the world is ruled by evil elites who want to enslave humanity

2026-06-12 07:52:24 UTC

"no one talks about the Epstein files anymore, the media want to cover it up 😡😡"
bro, EVERY person on this damn planet already knows about those shitty meaningless documents, even my senile grandfather talked about it ffs, I hate the distorted perception of people

2026-06-11 23:48:29 UTC

Restrictive laws are an expression of a pathological paranoia that rejects the idea that humans are capable of living together peacefully.

2026-06-11 09:18:57 UTC

Education is seriously overrated. Being educated is at least as dangerous as being uneducated, and I would argue it is even more dangerous when it comes to cultural interpretive authority.
A major misconception, which apparently is culturally unquestioned, is that wisdom increases linearly with the quantity of knowledge. There is actually zero benefit to reading a large number of books or scientific publications.
Intuition beats "knowledge". It's that simple. You know the phrase "it's not that deep"? Well it's really not that deep. Because it's the childlike nature within us that lets us discover new things and expand our understanding of the world.
People like Newton, Darwin and Einstein didn't turn the world upside down by reading a lot. They did it by simply asking "what if?". Their conception of the world required absolutely no knowledge of their respective fields of expertise. Insight requires nothing more than intuition.
Knowledge is an instrument of power. The system dictates what counts as a "fact" and what *must* be accepted as such. To engage in this game for one's own political interests is either doomed to fail or its success was part of the plan from the very beginning.
When I'm confronted with the horrendous lies about MAPs and the legitimizing narratives that are responsible for the oppression of youth, I don't care how it's actually "factually incorrect", because it was never about "facts". It's about the power to define the narrative.
Truth requires no complex elaboration in form of countless repetitions. The truth does not need to explain itself at all. Because the truth is more beautiful than any lie could ever be. It just needs concrete action for it to unfold in the world.
https://mapsupport.de/system/media_attachments/files/116/730/679/625/713/235/original/507783f72a05f179.jpg

2026-06-10 21:19:32 UTC

- reply

Yeah it's interesting to think about these things deeply instead of judging immediately.
You make interesting points about the limitations, I think they are important aspects on how to enhance AI and make it more similar to biological intelligence.
One of the reasons why I emphasize the lack of emotions in AI is that I think that even in a continuous run closed loop they cannot become an autonomous being without having emotions that guide them to form a specific thought. It's the prompts (among other things) who take on this role for AI.
It's not that I'm saying AI can't be creative, but the deciding impulse comes from the direction that people set which means it doesn't come from within the AI but from the outside. So I think the creativity produced by AI ultimately still originates from human emotions.

2026-06-09 18:37:35 UTC

The only difference that sets human intelligence apart from AI are the presence of emotions. All the other points raised regarding why "AI" isn't "real intelligence" come from this circumstance.
Emotions are great. Emotions are essentially what make us human and what make life worth living. Emotions are responsible for meaning in life. Emotions are the basis of all creative and innovative work.
At the same time, however, one must acknowledge that the cognitive abilities of humans can be replaced one-for-one by AI. There is nothing we understand that an AI cannot also "understand".

2026-05-15 17:03:02 UTC

"love is love", except...
"equal rights for all", except...
"my body, my choice", except...
"no human is illegal", except...
"no cops, no prisons", except...
...

2026-05-06 16:31:31 UTC

The absurdity of the term "pedocriminal":
1. A person who slaughtered multiple children after torturing them but who might also have touched them at their genitals at one point (not confirmed)
2. A person who's caught having a loving relationship with a child
3. A person who physically abuses their own children for many years, generally treating them like shit, but who also creates hurtcore CP with their children to share it online (they are not even attracted to children themselves)
4. A person who shares fictional lolicon and AI content online
According to Germany, all these individuals would be labeled as "pedocriminals".

2026-05-02 16:22:42 UTC

I'm not exclusive and I wouldn't even say that my sexual attraction to little girls is that much stronger than to women, but I have to say that my love for little girls is so much more vivid and intense than for women.
It's such indescribable emotions I have when I'm confronted with little girls in any way. Whenever I see or even think of them, I simply feel *fulfilled*. And it doesn't even matter if they are just fictional lolis. It's really like the most beautiful feeling I can feel.
But It is all the more horrifying to imagine that there are people out there who label these feelings as wrong, pathological and dangerous. I wish they could feel the same feelings, at least for a moment, just to see whether they'll continue to believe in these labels or not.

2026-03-27 14:51:24 UTC

"To truly protect children, we must give parents back more responsibility and rights in raising their children."
I love how self-proclaimed "critical thinkers" always come to this conclusion regarding digital surveillance under the guise of child protection. They never think one step further, as they only care about preserving their own anonymity instead of really questioning narratives.
No, you can't expect parents to operate totalitarian surveillance on their children, that's exactly why these government measures are being introduced in the first place.
Never do they question the "protection" itself, and never do they consider one simple concept that would solve not only their own problems but also those of many others: youth liberation.

2026-03-20 23:23:54 UTC

I don't know whether X or reddit is the worst social media platform in existence right now.
One is a literal garbage dump of the most hateful, bitter and cynical people in society, while the other is a totalitarian moralist nightmare filled with the most arrogant, pretentious and egocentric people in society.
However, what they have in common is their incredibly strong resentment towards those disgusting, sickening and evil people called "pedophiles".

2026-03-20 10:54:22 UTC

- reply

In some way, yes. But at least within the MAP community there is no reason to discuss it really. And outside of it, the focus should not be the matter itself, but what produces it. Always address the root cause, not just the symptoms.

2026-03-17 15:35:01 UTC

- reply

My post exactly had the intention to say that we don't need to explain the obvious (adult-youth relationships are possible).
There is no explanation needed regarding a "stance", because it shifts the focus on unnecessary and even harmful discussion, as it would give antis the upper hand in any case.
Phrased a bit more provocatively: There is no "fight" to be won over a stance that claims that such relationships are inherently not possible, because it lacks any intellectual basis to have a reasonable debate about it. Because it''s solely based on cultural narratives that demonizes us in the first place.
Therefore just focus on what really matters: it's the systemic foundation that needs MAPs as a scapegoat and claims that those relationships are not possible. It's not the facts themselves that need to be discussed.

2026-03-12 12:38:56 UTC

Stop losing yourself in moral arguments.
The 60s/70s were not shaped by moralist movements, but by emancipation & liberation movements.
It was also the last time when people had a will to fight for their freedom, instead of simply fueling their own resentment.

2026-03-11 20:13:12 UTC

MAPs are the most important people of this time period.
We live in a world in which every person is doomed to believe certain narratives which they will never be able to question.
Only the MAP perspective is technically able to see through all the lies on which the system is built.
It is the task of MAPs to finally become revolutionary subjects, and not remain the same bootlickers with slave mentality.
We must understand that MAPs are the protagonists of this story.

2026-03-10 07:34:11 UTC

People don't want to hear this, but:
Today's "feminism" is what "socialism" was in the 20th century. A brainrot term designed to be culturally untouchable if you decide to "fight for the good".
Back then the term "socialism" was used by all sorts of groups and people, many of them being considered as right ideologies today (with national socialism as the most prominent example).
Same goes now for feminism in all their different variations. It's not about emancipation anymore, it transformed itself solely into an instrument of oppression.
Furthermore: Patriarchy (a concept that many don't even understand) can never be abolished *within* this system.
Expanded on the MAP topic, it becomes clear, why oppression never ends if a cultural dominant "fight for the good" concept is never questioned, besides from those who are questionable themselves. MAPs are one of the main scapegoats of "feminism", just as jews often were the scapegoats of "socialism".

2026-03-09 13:35:27 UTC

It's always the same with public figures.
https://mapsupport.de/system/media_attachments/files/116/199/456/967/291/803/original/efc0e10a1330eb1d.jpg

2026-03-07 14:47:58 UTC

- reply

People always abuse ideas for power. I personally don't see the problem in traditional leftist concepts such as communism or anarchism, and I do think capitalism is making youth and MAP liberation nearly impossible as for now.
I rather see the problem in the people who gather around this ideas. It's the obnoxious moralists who have no sense of beauty in life, but only misery in their hearts.

2026-03-07 13:51:29 UTC

2026 is the year where leftists officially become more anti-MAP than the right.
I've never seen so much so much anti narratives like now from people I sympathized with in the past.
In fact, the right could even become more sympathetic towards some aspects of minor attraction (hebephilia, fictional content, AI) as they are being pushed towards it. I wouldn't be a fan, but it is what is.
Of course both developments were initiated by the whole Epstein drama.

2026-03-07 10:33:38 UTC

I never liked contact stances, but nowadays I find them just silly.
It's like having a stance on whether lolicon is linked to pedophilia or not.
Some things are simply too obvious to even mention, let alone argue about.

2026-02-04 11:15:41 UTC

As long as this system exists, children and MAPs are doomed to be oppressed, because it fundamentally relies on that oppression.
MAPs should focus on bringing their views and analysis into the system-critical landscape rather than trying to appeal to "politicians" or the masses who are there to supress them in the first place.
(Although I would also encourage spreading MAP positive messages in immediate vicinity, even as far as having an outing where it's appropriate)