ed

I still can't see why that'd be considered a violation of the OSD and not a license violation... I wasn't at the OSI at the time, I was on the FSFE board (or about to join it, I don't remember the exact dates). Worth discussing it over beers :)

2025-01-28 22:20:31 UTC

- reply

I'm confused. Are you talking about GPL violations according to the interpretation of the FSF?

2025-01-28 12:46:52 UTC

- reply

"a couple of years before OSI was founded", you wrote?

2025-01-28 10:59:14 UTC

The licenses of Llama and Deepseek contain clear violations of the Open Source Definition, these things are *not* Open Source at a more fundamental level.
The new Open Source AI Definition doesn't even kick in.
So much noise and disinformation.

2024-11-04 18:20:31 UTC

- reply

one of the best versions in English https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSpqj3V0s2E

2024-10-28 16:03:45 UTC

“The new definition requires Open Source models to provide enough information about their training data so that a ‘skilled person can recreate a substantially equivalent system using the same or similar data,’ which goes further than what many proprietary or ostensibly Open Source models do today,” said Ayah Bdeir, who leads AI strategy at Mozilla. https://opensource.org/blog/the-open-source-initiative-announces-the-release-of-the-industrys-first-open-source-ai-definition #OpenSource

2024-08-30 11:57:52 UTC

A toast to Elastic, to #OpenSource, to #Copyleft and the #agplv3
Welcome back!
https://www.elastic.co/blog/elasticsearch-is-open-source-again