Now focusing on ring signatures for the crux I see, got it. FCMP++ is on the way because Monero people very obviously recognize the faults with ring signatures. It's why people are excited for it. By your logic, the one-time pubkey would actually be one-time with FCMP++ then, yes?
A core difference between Monero and Bitcoin for the most part is that Monero is constantly focused on improving its privacy to the maximum degree. It can upgrade to improve. Meanwhile covenants are dead in the water and people are floundering around with subpar alternatvies and solutions leaving you forced to twist and contort reasoningt with retarded claims like claiming fee amounts going on chain gets people arrested.
That is hilarious. Saying outlandish idiotic things like that thinking you can just say them because ring signatures are bad is the silly veneer I'm talking about.
Amounts routed are not encrypted to channel partners in lightning that is false.
Saying it's a privacy leak that someone knows how much they sent someone else is the kind of mental gymnastic I find fucking hilarious. It's Olympic level.
The difference with the Blink case is that lightning's glaringly obvious privacy issues don't rely on getting someone's private key, any ole 3rd party can just glean data off the network.
Super gymnast.
naruto / Naruto
npub1w2…c7tte
2026-10-09 00:03:33 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…2m38
Author Public Key
npub1w2rfg6swqzjgv84h23lwp2vdga4w90wntxejmf4zfhrwl0kuzqpqvc7ttePublished at
2026-10-09 00:03:33 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "6d47926a2aaea41c9e73349ae879f0b01705086d794de714c942d2a26f6bf349",
"pubkey": "7286946a0e00a4861eb7547ee0a98d476ae2bdd359b32da6a24dc6efbedc1002",
"created_at": 1791504213,
"kind": 1111,
"tags": [
[
"E",
"a1cb750f09593d57a9724612f2eecd4d0cd05d213f9583aa21efcf35a752807f",
"wss://nostr.mom/",
"2183e94758481d0f124fbd93c56ccaa45e7e545ceeb8d52848f98253f497b975"
],
[
"K",
"1"
],
[
"P",
"2183e94758481d0f124fbd93c56ccaa45e7e545ceeb8d52848f98253f497b975",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"e",
"faca4c50da8cb46a613c2bd0b293d432a8b3d8f05741075bd873238c67e6f59a",
"wss://nostr.mom/",
"2183e94758481d0f124fbd93c56ccaa45e7e545ceeb8d52848f98253f497b975"
],
[
"k",
"1111"
],
[
"p",
"2183e94758481d0f124fbd93c56ccaa45e7e545ceeb8d52848f98253f497b975",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"client",
"Amethyst"
]
],
"content": "Now focusing on ring signatures for the crux I see, got it. FCMP++ is on the way because Monero people very obviously recognize the faults with ring signatures. It's why people are excited for it. By your logic, the one-time pubkey would actually be one-time with FCMP++ then, yes?\n\nA core difference between Monero and Bitcoin for the most part is that Monero is constantly focused on improving its privacy to the maximum degree. It can upgrade to improve. Meanwhile covenants are dead in the water and people are floundering around with subpar alternatvies and solutions leaving you forced to twist and contort reasoningt with retarded claims like claiming fee amounts going on chain gets people arrested.\n\nThat is hilarious. Saying outlandish idiotic things like that thinking you can just say them because ring signatures are bad is the silly veneer I'm talking about.\n\nAmounts routed are not encrypted to channel partners in lightning that is false.\n\nSaying it's a privacy leak that someone knows how much they sent someone else is the kind of mental gymnastic I find fucking hilarious. It's Olympic level.\n\nThe difference with the Blink case is that lightning's glaringly obvious privacy issues don't rely on getting someone's private key, any ole 3rd party can just glean data off the network.\n\nSuper gymnast.",
"sig": "79989cad5b898d1e4441e0db5411191e8ef17fda61c806e84e184a80da898c119c5c6ff6c3e1617adb6d7f67c5b924d1988bffe729b4e4a39a1ed224b100a8ae"
}