npub1h6zx48mues94cvpgnklhg0h9j4t29y248a285pppyxpvqmxnd5aqqgmvn7 (npub1h6z…mvn7)
> makes fringe assertion about historical figure
> does not cite any sources except schizo blog posts that do not mention the historical figure
> calls any interpretation of history other than their own “revisionist”
> demands evidence for the inverse of their claim
> cites common knowledge about person as if it supports their point
> refuses to acknowledge their non-sequiters and strawmans when called on it.
This is you.
I’m not debating inane retard theories anymore. Good luck.