Ulrike Hahn on Nostr: yes, that’s one of the traps the blog is trying to push back on. Underlying ...

yes, that’s one of the traps the blog is trying to push back on.

Underlying evidence can be way more conflicting than for climate and vaccine, though. It doesn’t need to be a consensus. If I engage (in good faith) with the relevant evidence in the required manner I’m not violating scientific norms even if I come to, and promote, a strong position - that’s not failing by the standards of science.