nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyry2ysn5av9pr8m76kgpggcflz294t0pr9shd99kh8redys7ku0xkefw8t5 (nprofile…w8t5) I wasn't thinking of bugs (your last sentence). I am coming from having never used a proof assistant. I've derived formulas for publications, but I've never published a 'proof'. Proofs are not something an astrophysicist typically does.
I think what you are saying is that if someone publishes a proof along with their proof-assistant source code, then I know that the formal computations are correct, but they may be the wrong formal computations. Perhaps the statement proven is not the statement needing to be proven.
Have I got it?
An example would be interesting.