Moreover, I feel that I was very fortunate to have received a job in academia, and this week I finished the first draft of the paper about GRASP (which - even if isn't great as a piece of "academic literature" - already had a therapeutic value to me)
I shared it with the head of our institute, a few days ago, but so far the feedback that I got is that my tone is too essayistic - which is probably right, because that's the style that I developed over the years, first at the Philosophy department, and then on Quora, focusing more on the ease of reading than on presenting raw content with RQ1, RQ2 etc.
In either case, the draft is available here (around 25 pages/10000 words):
https://github.com/panicz/grasp/tree/180c54191e4d1e431ec6455d97e657ec21ced2c5/doc/gvp
I'd appreciate your feedback, especially if you're from academia (so I'm thinking particularly about nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyrh639nycgxhymn6anjamhawmaefs7ygwgf5hrdkajtx5he3trnsw3hjse2 (nprofile…jse2) and nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyz97n3npg2a3yvcv7c3fyl300nu3jcl363n88z786rwutp2kjxpf7e7d54f (nprofile…d54f) but of course I'll be grateful for everybody's remarks)