nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq6ns2el46gnn3e6fp228xszct3du9lnlq72f5uud9aseuf3nt032qmkyt30 (nprofile…yt30) 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘 (nprofile…nxac)
To not consider evidence, isn't science. You are saying, to paraphrase "search of truth" says science lies? NO. That is not even close to what it is. Fuck it, I have a PhD in Chem, and you are telling me I don't know the difference between the bullshit lies the PUBLICATIONS are not corrupt, it's the idea of "science" misleading from truth?
Seriously, you have confused the issue of "science" with the gatekeeprs of the truth that have been OVERTLY been corrupting "science" for about 100 years through this bullshit lying system about what science is. If you want to through out the ONLY reasonable persute of truth, to distrust yourself and test your own theories, the ones that control the narrative have already rotted your brain. SCIENCE is the permute of truth, and to think it's "what's published" that you haven't tested yourself and found to be true is "science..." yea, that's BULLSHIT, that's not science.
The TERM is important. do NOT let ANYONE tell you a publication and "The Science Proves" is a real scientist. This is there ULTIMATE game, make you doubt what is REAL and trust the narrative.
It's not science that's wrong, it's what stories you are told and believe that are the lies. Science has NOTHING to do with "what get's published and reported." That's money, politics, not science. What if they tell you "the sky is really green, you don't see it" (trust me, that's probably published somewhere, misleading for 1900's clickbate). MEDIA is corrupt, not science. MEDIA coverage of science was the first thing they corrupted. LOOK AT WHO OWNS THE JOURNALS and what "published" and "peer reviewed" mean now, vs even 30-40 years ago. That's MEDIA corruption by ownership of publication, deception,... on and on. CLEAR. But "science" under attack is to say "true isn't true anymore,"
Question, if "science" (provide fact, evidence, test it) isn't true, how is anything YOU say true? Attacking the language like that is a HUGE issue of mind control. NEVER stop questioning "is this really true." Anyone that says not to, is NOT a scientist.
Dr. Coyote, Conspiracy Therapist
npub1le…y5757
2026-02-26 06:03:10 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…y7rn
Author Public Key
npub1lergu5zwwumq58w4evx5zlh4ngtac789htk025rzyksn4g83valsuy5757Seen on
wss://relay.mostr.pubPublished at
2026-02-26 06:03:10 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "0a955a69785657693d424b7f64314806f386ca20498df995d33bf749c2138602",
"pubkey": "fe468e504e77360a1dd5cb0d417ef59a17dc78e5baecf5506225a13aa0f1677f",
"created_at": 1772085790,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"d4e0acfeba44e71ce921528e680b0b8b785fcfe0f2934e71a5ec33c4c66b7c54",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub"
],
[
"p",
"eb94e902217523a07f5a8d3a07f690019df60b28e233a5daf6a6da205499117d",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub"
],
[
"p",
"dbfb74295b4e9e703515c674012f5bad6e2dacdbda53f043e79504a00bda5d01",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub"
],
[
"e",
"af7ef0fe7cbbc2fc85c3b72133562fdeb2a00a6f5f645844d255986c9216336f",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://shitposter.world/objects/d518f3e5-f909-45f1-920f-c4e54f045f30",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq6ns2el46gnn3e6fp228xszct3du9lnlq72f5uud9aseuf3nt032qmkyt30 nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqaw2wjq3pw536ql6635aq0a5sqxwlvzeguge6tkhk5mdzq4yez97s8gnxac \n\nTo not consider evidence, isn't science. You are saying, to paraphrase \"search of truth\" says science lies? NO. That is not even close to what it is. Fuck it, I have a PhD in Chem, and you are telling me I don't know the difference between the bullshit lies the PUBLICATIONS are not corrupt, it's the idea of \"science\" misleading from truth?\n\nSeriously, you have confused the issue of \"science\" with the gatekeeprs of the truth that have been OVERTLY been corrupting \"science\" for about 100 years through this bullshit lying system about what science is. If you want to through out the ONLY reasonable persute of truth, to distrust yourself and test your own theories, the ones that control the narrative have already rotted your brain. SCIENCE is the permute of truth, and to think it's \"what's published\" that you haven't tested yourself and found to be true is \"science...\" yea, that's BULLSHIT, that's not science. \n\nThe TERM is important. do NOT let ANYONE tell you a publication and \"The Science Proves\" is a real scientist. This is there ULTIMATE game, make you doubt what is REAL and trust the narrative.\n\nIt's not science that's wrong, it's what stories you are told and believe that are the lies. Science has NOTHING to do with \"what get's published and reported.\" That's money, politics, not science. What if they tell you \"the sky is really green, you don't see it\" (trust me, that's probably published somewhere, misleading for 1900's clickbate). MEDIA is corrupt, not science. MEDIA coverage of science was the first thing they corrupted. LOOK AT WHO OWNS THE JOURNALS and what \"published\" and \"peer reviewed\" mean now, vs even 30-40 years ago. That's MEDIA corruption by ownership of publication, deception,... on and on. CLEAR. But \"science\" under attack is to say \"true isn't true anymore,\"\n\nQuestion, if \"science\" (provide fact, evidence, test it) isn't true, how is anything YOU say true? Attacking the language like that is a HUGE issue of mind control. NEVER stop questioning \"is this really true.\" Anyone that says not to, is NOT a scientist.",
"sig": "17202867061c17a882b901e15215998aa10696b5d2bbc2a6318479d5102c85205ab3d8ec28339a9bb6268e0ae6ed218c759fdb01f04b34412fc0776a991fe605"
}