Join Nostr
2023-03-26 06:07:10 UTC

Trollcow on Nostr: ⚠️New YouTube Video 48> hours.⚠️ Corruption. When you hear this, you think of ...

⚠️New YouTube Video 48> hours.⚠️

Corruption.

When you hear this, you think of governments, you think of economic inequality, censorship or the media. These are all big things, things we, as individuals, cannot usually change.

But in reality, anything, anywhere and anyone can be corrupt. Although we all know the definition of corrupt, when asking ourselves the question of how we identify it, I give a simple explanation that I use myself:

“If you feel your rights have been violated to a shocking degree of severity, yet there is nothing to protect you from this persisted violation, and nothing to gain you justice for the prior consequences of it that wouldn’t cost you money, extreme work, or further risk to yourself.”

Corruption is being the victim of a crime that isn’t in the constitution. Corruption is witnessing a crime that you can’t call the police about. Corruption is having to pay for lawyers, commit crimes yourself or overwork yourself to mitigate suffering.

I tell people to stop thinking about about corruption in a specific sense, such as governmental. This is because even large scale corruption never starts out that way.

Corruption is slow, mostly legalized and incredibly manipulative.

What I’m about to say will be mocked, not understood or viewed as crazy, all of which I’m okay with, because I have realized that these responses are nothing more than a mere response to the type of corruption I’m about to tell you about.

Our “sektur” has become a monopoly, and a corrupt one. What we are partaking in, witnessing and funding is nothing short of witnessing a much smaller scale of brainwashed civilians donating to tyrants or tycoons in hope of a better quality of life, better treatment or simply just a decrease of their suffering.

We have given certain websites, and their owners, enough power to be able to control us through themselves, their sites or their user bases, our reputations, spread illegal misinformation for clickbait and sympathy points among their communities, about us that could get us killed or “jumped”, such as enabling false accusations of pedophilia, grooming, host non consensual pornography of us obtained via extortion, catfishing or abuse, fail to mitigate users from swatting the innocent, and control what comes up in search results for our own fucking names.

Owners of these sites then go on to state that suicide is a choice, and depression is a mindset, which is an excuse made in exchange for taking responsibility, for a lack of ethicality, and for inflicting suffering and corruption upon civilians. Just like a government.

This isn’t anti-censorship. This is a power imbalance.

A few people, e-celebs, websites or forums, having dominant control over a large number of vulnerable or well known people’s personal reputations, welfare and popularity, relying on reputation and herd mentality to further false narratives and dog pile people, and making up reasons for people to justify their mistreatment is not freedom. It is the opposite of freedom.

I hate power imbalances. I explain that I hate most of these sites because of the corruption, and power imbalances, and I am told that I am just mad that I have a thread.

Imagine telling somebody that their anger at obvious corruption means less because it’s personal, or because they think it is.

If you have a thread on Kiwi Farms or any affiliated websites and you aren’t angry, then you should be.

You should be angry enough to realize that what we are seeing is a tyranny, a monopoly and something that moved too quickly for Internet legality to catch up with.

If you are not angry, you are stupid.

These website owners use the same techniques that every other corrupt piece of shit uses and I watch everyone fall for it, and it’s shocking, especially in this sector, a place that mostly hates the government, tyranny, censorship, journalism or power imbalances.

When you see victims of abuse being called schizophrenic for reacting badly to it, do you believe they are crazy? When you see people being called insane, liars or gullible for trying to theorize about these site owners or websites, do you believe it? When you see these sites claim they are being attacked more than fucking ISIS websites are and try to gain donations or sympathy, using the idea they are being censored as a disguise and excuse, do you donate? When you see site owners claim things about people do you automatically believe them to avoid being banned, to avoid being dog piled or simply because that person has status?

I sometimes believe that maybe it’s a good sign I’m called schizophrenic, because I’d take that over being a brainwashed retard any day.

It is not your fault for unwillingly partaking in corruption, it is your fault for failing to question it.

You all will question everything, everyone and everywhere, but you don’t do this for online communities, or places closer to you, or people around you, why?

Why are you still playing their game? Wake up.