Forced false consensus, moving goal posts, or Motte and Bailey.
You're being intellectually dishonest by removing nuance in order to have a real good boy opinion.
Way to go! You did it! You said "killing people is bad" pat yourself on the back for having the safest opinion possible.
Nah. Killing people for expressing ideas in a tangible way is far worse than killing for tangible resources.
Even if you could prove (you can't) beyond a shadow of a doubt that all killings (millions you say) were done ONLY for natural resources.
Another point I could make to defeat your specious argument is that killing for resources is actually natural and that we are animals. Killing over the expression of ideas is however uniquely human.
Either way you should probably get better at arguing your points.
