Event JSON
{
"id": "f17564df5dbb1bf9abaa181c83c0d3000da9cf1703796394a1e4a6bc5840e483",
"pubkey": "5c9acaee738ed0dc123669eff0a6d01c9c2bcd04da7d965cca09c2992a73b5e8",
"created_at": 1788806722,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"imeta",
"url https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/117/231/237/185/222/168/original/e0ddf55efd6d79d4.png",
"m image/png",
"dim 1200x811",
"blurhash UHFqzv?QIR9Obcoes~R=02IYxx$_f1xTbLRk"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/thetransmitter/statuses/117231237334184532",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub"
]
],
"content": "I fear that placing too much emphasis on a specific interpretation of dimensionality, or treating dimensionality as an end-all quantification of some aspect of neural computation, may lead us down the wrong path, writes Matthew Perich.\n\nhttps://www.thetransmitter.org/neural-dynamics/dimensionality-neurosciences-red-herring/?utm_source=mastodon\u0026utm_medium=org-social\u0026utm_campaign=20260907-perspectives-dimensionality-neurosciences-red-herring\n\nhttps://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/117/231/237/185/222/168/original/e0ddf55efd6d79d4.png",
"sig": "ab6c9bd39776658a631f87a3e502e15e753f3c14dadfab171b03cf248659e543e75d267dbcc6de699a53f23322581b2f61e29a584471cbc5bde9fcd33989e87c"
}