<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Jay wrote</title><author_name>Jay (npub10m…x27hf)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub10mtatsat7ph6rsq0w8u8npt8d86x4jfr2nqjnvld2439q6f8ugqq0x27hf</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Going faster at the expense of increasing tail risk in the future isn&#39;t a gain in efficiency. It might even be a net negative considering how bad the risky outcomes get. &#xA;&#xA;To gain efficiency, you have to find a way to go faster while also keeping your risks the same or less than before. Otherwise you&#39;re just building increasingly fragile things at a faster and faster rate.&#xA;&#xA;Any conversation about the efficiency gains AI brings has to take this into account or the whole enterprise is dishonest.</html></oembed>