rich1.0daniella (npub1tm…ucu5x)https://nostr.now/npub1tmda3pwknv0sx55g8d0lhcehqqhf8jke6rd2st5fr0pgkhau9y0qyucu5xnjumphttps://nostr.nowThis is why #BIP110 matters more than ever: BITCOIN IS BECOMING FIAT There are real financial incentives to flood Bitcoin with non-monetary data including .jpegs, inscriptions, ordinals, and tokens.[1][4][5][6][7] - At scale, VC capital is paying for Bitcoin to not be Bitcoin. My independent research across 169 companies found that 56% of "Bitcoin-companies" have drifted into non-Bitcoin products, including every single company with a raise above $50M.[2] - STRC's Cantillon reconstruction on the protocol is another example of this.[3] It's the very "financial engineering" Bitcoin was designed to end. - Many of the largest Bitcoin influencers, educators, and conference organisers are funded by the same fiat structures they claim to oppose.[8] Sponsorship, affiliate, and ad revenue create a feedback loop where the creator cannot scrutinise the company paying for their reach. At $480,000 for a single sponsorship deal, the financial incentive to stay silent is structural, not personal.[8] Across the entire industry, from development to marketing, the money is on the side of making Bitcoin not Bitcoin. BITCOIN IS MONEY Bitcoin was created to be money: "A peer-to-peer electronic cash system." That is the title of the white paper and the entire point of the protocol.[9] For 5,000 years, every civilisation that handed control of its money to a central authority followed the same sequence: Debasement, inflation, inequality, collapse, reset.[11] The flaw was centralized trust. Bitcoin is the first technology in history that removes it entirely, enforcing a fixed supply through mathematics and a decentralised network distributing trust. That is one of Bitcoin's most important contributions and it only works if the network stays decentralised. THE PROBLEM When non-monetary data floods the chain, it triggers a sequence that leads to Bitcoin becoming a vehicle to perpetuate fiat. The more non-monetary data, the faster the blockchain grows, which raises the cost of running a full node, which reduces the number of people who can participate, which weakens decentralisation, which compromises security, which means Bitcoin stops being the tool that ends the 5,000-year fiat extraction cycle.[11] THE SOLUTION BIP-110 is a temporary soft fork that restricts non-monetary data at the consensus level. Over 21% of reachable nodes have already migrated to Bitcoin Knots, and now over 13% are also running BIP-110 (aka RDTS).[10] This combo is a measurable signal that a meaningful portion of the network still treats Bitcoin as money. DON'T TRUST, VERIFY The funding relationships are there to find, though sometimes undisclosed.[8] I didn't realise this until recently. Writing the series is what made me see how important "don't trust, verify" is, even for structures I thought were a given. Before you take anyone's word on their funding models and BIP-110, including mine, check their incentives. One way to do so is to ask an Ai to run an integrity check on any Bitcoin influencer, developer, or company. I hadn't done this work so deeply until recently. What I found changed how I see the entire space. WHY I'M WRITING THIS The fiat system specialises in making its own logic feel like common sense: "Of course yield is necessary. Of course running a node is too complicated. Of course the ETF is safer." These are what rational actors do when the incentive structure is built around them.[13] That's the sophistication of what Bitcoin is up against, but the money behind what's being said online is findable. I thought things were different in Bitcoin, that we were genuinely changing the world, not just talking about it. I've experienced a lot of disillusionment this year and the series covers it. But there is a silver lining. The protocol is intact. 12,000 nodes are enforcing Bitcoin as money by signalling for BIP-110.[10] Everything is becoming more visible. Thousands of nodes holding the line is the signal that matters. CONTEXT & SOURCES I referenced my own work a lot here but each piece contains independent research and refers to the work of others: [1] Liberati, D. (2026, June 12). Fiat incentives in Bitcoin: A department-by-department map. https://daniella.io/fiat-incentives-everywhere/ [2] Liberati, D. (2026). Why Bitcoin companies drift. https://daniella.io/bitcoin-funding [3] Liberati, D. (2026, June 12). STRC explained: The Cantillon effect rebuilt on Bitcoin. https://daniella.io/bitcoin-strc [4] Liberati, D. (2026, June 9). Bitcoin Core vs Bitcoin Knots + BIP 110: Which node should you run? https://daniella.io/core-vs-knots/ [5] hodlonaut. (2026, March 27). The capture: The network. Citadel21. https://www.citadel21.com/the-network [6] hodlonaut. (2026, April 29). The capture: The lever. Citadel21. https://www.citadel21.com/the-lever [7] hodlonaut. (2026). The capture: The merge. Citadel21. https://www.citadel21.com/the-merge [8] Liberati, D. (2026). How money shapes the signal. https://daniella.io/bitcoin-marketing [9] Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [10] Dashjr, L. (2026, June 22). Bitcoin network statistics. Luke Dashjr. https://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/services.html [11] Liberati, D. (2026). The 5,000-year economic karmic cycle that Bitcoin is ending [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9HtTw897BA [12] Liberati, D. (2026, June 1). Nostr's retention problem: A structural diagnosis. https://daniella.io/nostr-retention-structural-diagnosis/ [13] Liberati, D. (2026, June 14). The comfortable trap: The fiat-to-Bitcoin transition. https://daniella.io/the-comfortable-trap/ Additional reading: Liberati, D. (2026, May 21). The 5,000-year economic karmic cycle that Bitcoin is ending. https://daniella.io/fiat-money-karmic-cycle/ Liberati, D. (2026, May 7). The prison door is open. https://daniella.io/leaving-fiat/