<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>waxwing wrote</title><author_name>waxwing (npub1va…knuu7)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1vadcfln4ugt2h9ruwsuwu5vu5am4xaka7pw6m7axy79aqyhp6u5q9knuu7</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>an interesting point about this: there&#39;s a reason bitcoin devs tried quite strenuously, and eventually succeeded several years ago, in removing all openssl dependency from the bitcoin project. it&#39;s the nature of some of the truly awful protocols (ASN1 , X509 and etc etc) that openssl had to, or chose to support. so yes a very natural and correct reaction is &#34;holy shit what happens when people find similar bugs in the consensus layer of bitcoin&#34; but it&#39;s also true that it&#39;s a very controlled and very stress-tested surface area that removed stuff that was problematic. It&#39;s also true that even 1 small bug could be catastrophic. I guess we&#39;ll see!&#xA;&#xA;nostr:nevent1qqsgehzm6ggqe2nszaq5xlxlmcwlqh7l62mcpr82gs2k0htuqlust4sprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumr0wpczuum0vd5kzmp0qgs0w2xeumnsfq6cuuynpaw2vjcfwacdnzwvmp59flnp3mdfez3czpsrqsqqqqqp7fcr3y</html></oembed>