rich1.0Jackk (npub183…faslh)https://nostr.now/npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslhnjumphttps://nostr.nowNothing is more ironic than watching “Bitcoiners” with physics degrees ask AI to find new physics while refusing to look at Bitcoin for the answer. Definitely don’t look at the proof-of-work system computing discrete blocks of time and memory from causal state transitions. Bitcoiner in name only? What happened to first principles? Physicists who refuse to acknowledge what the double-spend problem actually solved physically will get lost worshipping the false god of AI. The physics is fiat without a resolution to the measurement problem. Bitcoin is the new physics until falsified. You cannot solve the double spend without a quantized block. It isn’t a theory. It’s an instantiation of proof.