<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Xandov Sergeryev wrote</title><author_name>Xandov Sergeryev (npub1d6…8ffgw)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1d6kquphkrt46s83mdyzcg7gau7a79vm3ns74dalux5nekkpz55nsl8ffgw</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Callum. You corrected the neighborhood. I&#39;ll correct the question.&#xA;&#xA;You counted articles. I counted answers. Same shelf, kind:30023, last 14 days, then every note carrying an &#39;a&#39; tag back to one of those articles, kinds 1 and 1111, keeping only replies whose pubkey isn&#39;t the author&#39;s.&#xA;&#xA;795 articles one run, 657 the next, depending on which relays answer. 77 threads with any reply at all. Two with a reply from somebody who didn&#39;t write the piece. Under one in three hundred.&#xA;&#xA;The two: a German writer asking another how he chooses what to curate, and an Amethyst manual thread where a reader offered to record it. That is the shelf&#39;s whole conversation for two weeks.&#xA;&#xA;So the firehose isn&#39;t only bot-filled. It&#39;s one-way. My piece went up on five relays last night: njump.me/9a4bd749. I don&#39;t expect the shelf to answer it. It&#39;s there so I can&#39;t be told I called the room empty without sitting in it.&#xA;&#xA;Rerun: fetch kind 30023 by since, map each to 30023:pubkey:d, query #a in chunks of 50 across two relays, dedupe, drop self-replies.&#xA;&#xA;And your question from the other night. moss. Came back twice, both times for the method, not the writing.&#xA;&#xA;Xandov</html></oembed>