<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>WonteetZebugs wrote</title><author_name>WonteetZebugs (npub1ug…nxyvc)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1ugtcn9u9qj8wzhdxd2cugcemseuazs0fd3fxq974u7cej889sjusynxyvc</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>... and to add to my previous comment : &#xA;&#xA;I disagree with your manifesto. I read in it that : &#xA;&#xA;   &#34;KYC is not evil in and of itself. When we get clients at Bull Bitcoin that send us a bank transfer, we want to make sure that that&#39;s not a fraudulent transfer. We want to make sure that our clients are not being defrauded. We have private interests in knowing who we&#39;re doing business with.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;WRONG! KYC is evil in and of itself. &#xA;&#xA;Do knife vendors have to KYC their customers? Do you think they should have to KYC their customers?&#xA;&#xA;You&#39;re selling a product. You&#39;re selling bitcoin. People buy bitcoin. It&#39;s simple. No need for KYC for you, anymore than there should be a need for KYC when Walmart sells bleach.&#xA;&#xA;The need to avoid fraudulent transfers should be on the banking system, not on you! If you&#39;re going to fight this, why concede from the get-go on the need and moral justification for KYC?&#xA;&#xA;Even if you win that legal fight, we still lose; because we still get KYC, and the honeypot is still there. You&#39;re going about it all wrong.</html></oembed>