<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>waxwing wrote</title><author_name>waxwing (npub1va…knuu7)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1vadcfln4ugt2h9ruwsuwu5vu5am4xaka7pw6m7axy79aqyhp6u5q9knuu7</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Do LN implementations make it a priority in their coin selection code, to open channels without change outputs? I guess not, but I was just thinking that channel opens are a unique opportunity for consolidation, because you usually don&#39;t care about exact amounts. While you can say, reasonably, &#34;nah, we&#39;d prefer to have the channel  open pattern the same as the payment pattern for privacy/anon set&#34;, the economics of utxos is going to be vitally important long term, plus removing change from a payment breaks some heuristics. Even more interesting ofc is if you could negotation a 2x no-change coinjoined channel open.&#xA;&#xA;#lightning </html></oembed>