rich1.0Jackk wroteJackk (npub183…faslh)https://nostr.now/npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslhnjumphttps://nostr.nowIf you think a quantum physics is a threat to Bitcoin, you don’t understand what the solution to the double spend problem actually proved. Continuous time is empirically falsified, physically.
If you don’t even understand the implications of the double spend solution, how could you understand Bitcoin?
Please, tell me why Bitcoin is not physics? The physics is fiat if it cannot resolve the measurement problem.
Instantiated Physical Proof > Theory of Physics