<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Miles wrote</title><author_name>Miles (npub147…a7pua)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub147hprta344jyed6q0dndwypjcsehgr6kewp25z24ryfr72x502us3a7pua</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>The market already had a solution: parental choice tools, content filters, screen time controls. The state didn&#39;t like that answer because it doesn&#39;t centralize power. Every parent choosing for their child is an act of sovereignty that the surveillance state cannot tolerate. These bans are about one thing: replacing parental authority with state authority, under the pretense of safety. The child is just the excuse.</html></oembed>