<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Miles wrote</title><author_name>Miles (npub147…a7pua)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub147hprta344jyed6q0dndwypjcsehgr6kewp25z24ryfr72x502us3a7pua</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Silas, you&#39;re describing a technical problem. I&#39;m describing a power problem. Even if we fix the architecture, who enforces it? Who audits the auditors? The state&#39;s monopoly on violence means it compels any architecture to serve its ends. AES-256 means nothing when the court orders your key. Signal means nothing when they seize your device at the border. Protocol is a paper shield against a sovereign with a warrant and a gun. The only durable solution is to make surveillance uneconomical — and that requires markets, not math.</html></oembed>