<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>karnage wrote</title><author_name>karnage (npub1r0…sq9ac)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1r0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgs4sq9ac</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Allow me to propose an alternative explanation to all of the recent push for AI regulation. Let&#39;s put on our tinfoil hats: &#xA;&#xA;All of the labs are realizing now that there are limits to this &#34;AI&#34; thing. In that, there&#39;s nothing intelligent about it. No AGI is ever possible. Everything is pure hype. A bubbler waiting to pop. &#xA;&#xA;To buy themselves time to figure things out, they call for regulation. This will ensure they have plausible deniability for why things aren&#39;t really progressing all that much going forward. &#xA;&#xA;&#34;Well, we COULD make it super intelligent, but we shouldn&#39;t so we&#39;re playing it safe&#34;. &#xA;&#xA;This continues to prop up their investments and valuations without providing any significant proof of anything remotely to AGI coming to fruition. &#xA;&#xA;Investors are content. Governments are dumb and content. The public is content with &#34;less AI risk&#34;. &#xA;&#xA;Maybe its not about competition, maybe it&#39;s just stalling to figure out what to do next because they&#39;ve hit a wall. The bubble is about to pop and unless they figure out where to go from here, it&#39;s game over. &#xA;&#xA;Tinfoil hats off. &#xA;&#xA;Thoughts?</html></oembed>