rich1.0Danish (npub1la…53737)https://nostr.now/npub1la2qka0maer0p8jfchfqdl6w2e4dwm3hkvjxh5tlyrr0ea26tx3sg53737njumphttps://nostr.nowNo no, brother, critique is more economical and not random ahh argument. Abdullah knows it. Their argument revolvs around capital accumulation requires time and muslims dont have luxury to existing capital(comparatively) nor for time to accumulate. Fiat supposed to be used efficiently for that, and it can help in developing military industrial complex and industrialization of nations, he then makes Arguments from history how soviet and china industrialized their nations. Then he concludes that any deflationary solution to muslim states is not viable and practical. For that he puts this above purity of money and ethics revolving around it. He discards all Arguments of individual sovereignty and state omnipotent nature, because the state of affairs we(muslims) are living in is not practical to afford deflationary economic model and ethics of money, rather any tools which can be used for industrialization and military complex, should be used efficiently. Any argumentation revolving around ethics are coming from libertarian anarcho capitalist ethics and not muslim tradition. Again Abdullah knows this, he had discussion with this brother, but only in tweets form. I was not making case against, i just listed it out so you can discuss about it in next ones