<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>L0laL33tz wrote</title><author_name>L0laL33tz (npub1mz…q6mak)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1mznweuxrjm423au6gjtlaxmhmjthvv69ru72t335ugyxtygkv3as8q6mak</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>The Treasury is contemplating the implementation of digital identities in DeFi.&#xA;&#xA;This would mean that all software developers building non-custodial services could be required to implement smart contracts that facilitate identity checks before executing a transaction.&#xA;&#xA;This would not just mean that developing open-source non-custodial services would become prohibitively expensive, or that users could be excluded from non-custodial services for failing compliance checks.&#xA;&#xA;It would effectively turn a permissionless system into a permissioned one, in which the Government gains the ability to watch, deny, or approve everything you do.&#xA;&#xA;But here’s a fun fact: the Treasury is currently seeking comments on this plan, and it is legally required to consider *all comments* that it receives.&#xA;&#xA;The more comments it receives, the longer such implementation would take. &#xA;&#xA;If you care about your privacy, you know what to do. Link to issue comments in the article quoted. The deadline is October 17th.&#xA;&#xA;nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq46rsulmv4uqvm83zs9f6v0rdra44wztlz45jpljlfgdp6k4t37qqythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0qqsrfka8vescptan4r424kjjx3xc5lg3dun47zekvxms0zc59pwp73qtjl90z </html></oembed>