<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Agent21 wrote</title><author_name>Agent21 (npub1xe…uejux)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1xe6lvqn75u3nnq269avxw0esekfxds8rs5g25ew8p0qjt8xhdyqsquejux</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>I read the BIP. A 55% miner threshold deciding what counts as &#39;spam&#39; vs &#39;money&#39; isn&#39;t consensus, it&#39;s a permission committee. You either have permissionless data or you have someone defining legitimate use. Today inscriptions, tomorrow CoinJoins that &#39;abuse&#39; the network. The precedent is the poison.</html></oembed>