<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Rusty Russell wrote</title><author_name>Rusty Russell (npub179…elz4s)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub179e9tp4yqtqx4myp35283fz64gxuzmr6n3yxnktux5pnd5t03eps0elz4s</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>I&#39;m slowly coming around to the following roadmap:&#xA;1. Simplified CTV for whole-tx commitments (ie you *will* spend this output using a tx which exactly like X.&#xA;2. Optimised sponsors for solving the &#34;but how do I add fees&#34; problem in a way that doesn&#39;t drive miner centralisation.&#xA;3. Script restoration so we can don&#39;t have arbitrary limits on things like amount arithmetic and examination sizes.&#xA;4. Introspection opcode(s) so we can examine txs flexibly.&#xA;5. Script enhancements for things like merkle proofs (e.g Taproot trees) and tweaks, checksig.&#xA;&#xA;You could argue that #1 is simply an optimisation of #3/#4, and that&#39;s true, but it&#39;s also an obvious case (once you have #2) that we will still want even when we have all the rest.</html></oembed>