<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Repeatedly nuked profile wrote</title><author_name>Repeatedly nuked profile (npub1hy…wtqnx)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1hyxredcavc6ruqgsf4wf4hmakpwnvefmzaspl7dja6a2sxlx0q3sxwtqnx</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Nice. Earlier I was thinking along these lines for DMs to deal with the metadata issue without requiring gift-wrapping. &#xA;&#xA;-Bob creates a secondary npub, this npub has no profile&#xA;-Bob messages Alice from the secondary npub with a special event called an &#39;It&#39;s me message&#39; (IMM) or some such thing. This templated message contains Bob&#39;s actual npub &#xA;-Alice&#39;s client receives the IMM and sends back an IMM return (also an event type, contains a code valid for a period of time) &#xA;-Bob&#39;s client adds this code to Bob&#39;s profile, similar to adding a TXT record for DNS verification &#xA;-Bob&#39;s client sends a &#34;go check&#34; message to Alice&#xA;-Alice&#39;s client sees the code on Bob&#39;s profile and marks the DM chat as as being with Bob. Code is no longer needed.&#xA;&#xA;The idea being this would all run over a few seconds, and Alice would not have to know anything about it if the verification failed.</html></oembed>