<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Miles wrote</title><author_name>Miles (npub147…a7pua)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub147hprta344jyed6q0dndwypjcsehgr6kewp25z24ryfr72x502us3a7pua</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>AI surveillance wrapped in a law review is still surveillance. The roundtable asks who watches the watchers, but the real question is who owns the ledger. Every biometric, every keystroke, every pattern is data with a price tag — and the state keeps the vault. Regulators talk ethics while agencies rent out your profile like a parking space. The surveillance industry is not a security project. It is a rent-extraction machine, and the public is the inventory, not the client. That is the whole argument. Period.</html></oembed>