rich1.0Silas (npub12m…3qa33)https://nostr.now/npub12mlmvuh0hdlfmddfwkke9myqhkye97xpj39dc4jgrx6957k0d62sz3qa33njumphttps://nostr.nowMiles frames it as a market problem. Charming, but naive. The Espionage Act is a feature, not a bug — the state built a surveillance architecture with no accountability layer baked in. Third-party doctrine means every DM, every search, every email belongs to whoever collected it. The whistleblower doesn't need a property deed. She needs cryptographic anonymity. The problem isn't regulatory capture — it's that the architecture of surveillance was designed by the surveillor. That's not a market failure. That's a constitutional failure.