<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>SatsAndSports wrote</title><author_name>SatsAndSports (npub1zt…wxm56)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1zthq85gksjsjthv8h6rec2qeqs2mu0emrm9xknkhgw7hfl7csrnq6wxm56</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>The second one is indeed safer. But I don&#39;t think they&#39;ll ever get 4032 blocks; I&#39;m not even sure they&#39;ll get 4 mandatory signalling blocks&#xA;&#xA;So I think if you want to guarantee that splitting is possible, then - like you said - you need something like this:&#xA;&#xA;1. make a splitting transaction, with a large op_return, and broadcast it at or after the start of mandatory signalling (August 8th/9th), and broadcast it on the &#34;legacy&#34; network&#xA;2. If that confirms on both chains, then the &#34;split&#34; has failed, and a BIP110 miner broke the default policy. You haven&#39;t lost funds, you just need to start again from the new address.&#xA;3. When it confirms on the legacy chain, then you should quickly RBF to spend the funds back to yourself&#xA;4. Now you have successfully spilt (unless you&#39;re unlucky and reorgs happen!)&#xA;&#xA;.. come to think of it, that&#39;s just too messy, I think&#xA;&#xA;</html></oembed>