<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>redshift wrote</title><author_name>redshift (npub1ft…redsh)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1ftt05tgku25m2akgvw6v7aqy5ux5mseqcrzy05g26ml43xf74nyqsredsh</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>I&#39;m not entirely against onchain zaps btw, but just wanna point out that silent payments don&#39;t have to be computationally intensive btw, since on-chain &#34;zaps&#34; are public anyway, the transaction and thus the receiving address can be public so the receiver won&#39;t have to scan at all. &#xA;&#xA;Silent payments at least help us prevent address reuse. &#xA;&#xA;One thing that bothers me is UTXO bloating. But well, nobody can stop anyone from doing anything.</html></oembed>