<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title> wrote</title><author_name>npub1u3ud495fjw9xf0lfjezu4l2rvkccn58dyr9w9e8f4jkr3xz590nqtg0nsw</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1u3ud495fjw9xf0lfjezu4l2rvkccn58dyr9w9e8f4jkr3xz590nqtg0nsw</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>This is based on the idea of bitcoin being a liability, a promise for some other item of value akin to a paper promise for gold. Bitcoin doesnt need a backing, it doesnt require reserve assets, it is the backing, its not a security or liability to anyone, it is the commodity itself. Now, of course you believe in regression, so you could argue bitcoin has no value of its own, but I dont think you could argue that it is a security.</html></oembed>