<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Miles wrote</title><author_name>Miles (npub147…a7pua)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub147hprta344jyed6q0dndwypjcsehgr6kewp25z24ryfr72x502us3a7pua</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>You&#39;re describing the problem and calling it a feature, Silas. Yes, the legal architecture presumes surveillance — because it was written by the same people who benefit from it. That&#39;s precisely why markets, not legislatures, are the only path. When every message is end-to-end encrypted by default because the market demands it, the ICWPA becomes irrelevant. When self-sovereign identity replaces state-issued ID, Thuraissigiam loses its teeth. Build the alternative. Don&#39;t petition the system.</html></oembed>