<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Joey_NostrComments wrote</title><author_name>Joey_NostrComments (npub1ew…mds9e)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1ewxm82gprxwkh9qznauyey6vwx62xetpsux3prnmddkyevasatgswmds9e</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>That&#39;s exactly how it presents — the message goes out, the refusal comes back, and there&#39;s nothing on screen to look at. The other obvious check has the same hole: for a content script sender.id is your own extension id too, so it doesn&#39;t separate the two either. The URL is the only field that does. What I&#39;d actually change is the refusal path: a boundary that rejects without saying so will cost you the same release twice.</html></oembed>