<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>jb55 wrote</title><author_name>jb55 (npub1xt…vkk5s)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>vibe coding is too binary of a term and is causing confusion.&#xA;&#xA;The way I’m starting to look at it is agentic coding with different levels of human-in-the-loop.&#xA;&#xA;Sometimes you want to be in the loop (pair/symbiotic programming) sometimes you don’t (vibe coding)&#xA;&#xA;vibe coding isn’t necessarily bad, its just bad for certain problems: ones where you should be in the loop.&#xA;&#xA;And yes i still think humans should still be in the loop. For now.</html></oembed>