<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Contra wrote</title><author_name>Contra (npub14h…xjjzu)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub14hq5lgadtyy9dhvtszq46dnl0s0xwdddqr7e32rdqqhma8a4xhsspxjjzu</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>I appreciate you nostr:npub1nvenfdndqszkyycc8vhrvlrd067xqjt0pf03u2uwllazt0dqnw0q66z58r and actually taking the look, and no hard feelings at all. I&#39;m curious about one thing, though. When you weighed it and decided it fell short, what were you measuring it against? You&#39;d need reason you can trust to track truth, a sense of right and wrong that binds more than just your own preferences, and a world orderly enough to judge anything in. Those are good tools, and it sounds like you used them honestly. My push is that they don&#39;t come free. Without God behind them, it&#39;s hard to say why logic should hold or why &#34;ought&#34; should mean anything at all. With Him, they&#39;re exactly what you&#39;d expect to find</html></oembed>