<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Jackk wrote</title><author_name>Jackk (npub183…faslh)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslh</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Peter, why are you not offering Bitcoin as a new informational perspective if time when you talk to these physicists. Bitcoin defines both nonlocality and locality. Blocks of time. Proof of work (energy) why isn’t Bitcoin physics?&#xA;&#xA;https://fountain.fm/episode/HffbDoeejJqVOxLlnEZB&#xA;&#xA;nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxqupzpwrxeemtukuzv62esqjgxg4cmaxrs9sgl7j6tdrufuaturv0wea9qqsrsvw8zn405sqk0n4a3xu48s5vqt720fcxdszxlrsz8sy40dmxyfs08qa5j</html></oembed>