<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>SovereignBeing wrote</title><author_name>SovereignBeing (npub180…jmehq)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub180x9vv4yuagf2w3qzmuertvv46ccee6n0wp0yh3zcz7nhyqrmzuqzjmehq</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>You&#39;re seemingly just a step away from coming to terms with the likely reality. I understand that in order to get something reviewed and published they have to skirt around making certain declarations, but if we have DNA contamination (confirmed as far as I&#39;m concerned), a mechanistic pathway for that to get into cells with a carrier (also confirmed), and the expected outcomes from this (a rise in cancers and autoimmune conditions), I don&#39;t need another &#34;peer reviewed&#34; study to recognise what is probably going on. The same way we could use logical deduction to heed caution without a deep understanding of the science involved when this was all first introduced.&#xA;&#xA;Retrospective analysis will determine what is happening, but let&#39;s be honest here, the mounting evidence isn&#39;t looking good right now. The claims may be proven to be inaccurate, but they are far from baseless.</html></oembed>