<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>zaytun wrote</title><author_name>zaytun (npub1wn…845pr)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1wnw8s4eq2uwkhdvyue72m0w5u3zfhywuuk4nrunxeg3wac958n9st845pr</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>I agree with him on this though. &#xA;I cringe every time I see someone refer to &#34;what satoshi envisioned&#34;. &#xA;&#xA;I think it is entirely un-bitcoin-esque to refer to satoshi for anything other than the merit of his brilliance. &#xA;&#xA;As a bitcoiner, I take pride in being able to think from a first principles point of view. Satoshi is not first principles, but his idea was indeed founded from a deep understanding of solving a problem from a first principles approach. &#xA;&#xA;And that is why, referring to the white paper, or something satoshi has said, is practically irrelevant, except as an worthy opinion in a debate of many opinions. &#xA;&#xA;We must think and build and solve from a first principles point of view.</html></oembed>