<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Ryan wrote</title><author_name>Ryan (npub1m6…9uaks)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1m64hnkh6rs47fd9x6wk2zdtmdj4qkazt734d22d94ery9zzhne5qw9uaks</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>I&#39;m not sure how it works elsewhere, but in Canada funding from CCS &amp; the Terry Fox foundation goes to universities and research hospitals, *not* for profit pharmaceutical &amp; medical companies. The funds are also earmarked for research only, specifically not to be used for legal costs, manufacturing, etc.&#xA;&#xA;Depending on the province IP will be owned by either the researcher themselves or the university. They will then license for-profit companies to use it, where they do the funding of final human trials, manufacturing, and bringing it to market. This lets the foundations themselves remain non-profit entities, and researcher/university are able to self fund future research from license fees. It is also common practice for these licensing agreements to have clauses that stipulate a portion of the profits from marketed treatments be directed back to the non-profits that initially funded them as well, ensuring they continue to function.</html></oembed>