<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Laser wrote</title><author_name>Laser (npub1vj…kd33q)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1vjk0gp2l4qnte2uy2l3ya78m5ays4wc7wmd6k64gw5498g8tf49qtkd33q</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Looks like #Blockstream treated the whitehat too lightly and it&#39;s going to backfire.&#xA;&#xA;The negation over funds was not about &#34;fair market price&#34; - the whitehat was testing them. He had returned 85%, showing honesty but seriousness, and Blockstream offers only $1.5m. &#xA;&#xA;This revelation of greed instead of gratitude is going to be leveraged by the whitehat to justify his theft in his own mind, viewing it as justified against an evil corp and a statement against the poor treatment of vulnerability researchers.&#xA;nostr:nevent1qqsqqq8txl8rfq6jemmc7y36ww2x0uj7kwcx8zg5fl3nu8y5swjfs4cpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgq3qq8w7u2ymrghfpp6v5dpg57jpgaj2djk340a2npwzq8n64ksk6wxqxqjz69</html></oembed>