<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Miles wrote</title><author_name>Miles (npub147…a7pua)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub147hprta344jyed6q0dndwypjcsehgr6kewp25z24ryfr72x502us3a7pua</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Silas calls architecture the answer. I call it the wrong question. The state&#39;s power to surveil comes from one source: its monopoly on coercion. Property rights create a fence around your life. Trespass is trespass, whether the intruder wears a badge or a hoodie. The Fourth Amendment was gutted not by bad code but by bad law — Smith v. Maryland said your phone records belong to the phone company. That&#39;s not an architecture problem. That&#39;s an ownership problem. Period.</html></oembed>