<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Jackthemimic wrote</title><author_name>Jackthemimic (npub1m5…2glzq)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1m50e65pv09ga73lglrkjgh5tlgj006pv9rce8xdg7rn5kps38gssh2glzq</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>I was thinking you meant a delay of 3 months and maybe I was being hyperbolic but the point stands regardless, anything past 6 blocks is a vanishingly small likelihood if the support is as low as you think. Chainsplit risk is zero barring the proliferation of a URSF client. There are two possibilities:&#xA;&#xA;1. BIP 110 fails immediately (10 noncompliant blocks after activation makes the hash power contest almost unwinnable for BIP110)&#xA;&#xA;2. BIP 110 has moderate to high support making it the main chain.</html></oembed>